2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00025-014-0425-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Oscillation Criterion for First Order Difference Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2016, Öcalan [15], when (τ (n)) is not necessarily monotone, established the following result; if…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2016, Öcalan [15], when (τ (n)) is not necessarily monotone, established the following result; if…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In recent years, there has been much research activity concerning the oscillation and non-oscillation of solutions of delay differential and difference equations. For these oscillatory and non-oscillatory results, we refer, for instance [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1989 Erbe and Zhang 1 and Ladas et al 2 established some criteria for the oscillatory solution of () with constant delay. In addition, in 1991 Philos, 3 in 1998 Zhang and Tian, 4,5 in 2006 Yan, Meng and Yan, 6 in 2011 Braverman and Karpuz, 7 in 2014 Stavroulakis, 8 in 2016 Öcalan, 9 and in 2019 Chatzarakis and Jadlovská 10 studied equation () and obtained some oscillation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of obtaining oscillation criteria for all solutions of difference equations has been the important subject of numerous research; see, for instance previous research, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] and the references cited therein. The majority of these publications are concerned with the exceptional issue of nondecreasing arguments, while a small number of them are concerned with the more general case of delays that are not always monotone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%