An outline of economic impacts of management options for Šumava National Park

Abstract

This analysis briefly compares the economic impacts of three potential future management scenarios for Šumava National Park (NP) in the Czech Republic: (1) continuation of current management, (2) the adoption of draft Bills that would declassify protected areas and enable developments (e.g. ski lift development) within some of the Park ' s most valuable habitats for wildlife, and (3) the adoption of proposals to expand the wilderness area in the Park ' s core with associated tourism opportunities. The proposals in the draft Bills have the potential to generate employment through ski lift development, but much of this activity will use imported labour and/or be short-term (e.g. associated with construction work). The financial viability of this development is uncertain for a number of reasons, including: likely requirements to compensate for damage to protected habitats, reduced future snow cover due to climate change, and competition to attract sufficient visitors to use the ski lift. The economic impacts of the adoption of the draft Bills (and, to a lesser extent, of continuing with current management) would also include negative effects on current nature tourism activity and on its long-term potential to expand. Currently, and certainly if the proposed plans in the draft Bill are adopted, the value of the NP as an area of wilderness and high-quality ecosystems will be reduced. This would weaken one of its key selling points as a tourism and recreation destination. The opportunity for international branding of the national park based on these ecosystems would be diminished. This damage to ecosystems would go against the views of the 75% of the Czech population who agree that it is important to halt the loss of biodiversity because we have a moral obligation to look after nature. Pro-wilderness development offers an alternative scenario. It would allow economic opportunities to be pursued to promote nature-based tourism at new locations and activities around an expanded non-intervention zone, while not undermining the ecological integrity of the NP. The Šumava NP is a unique area which supports a wide variety of habitats and species and has the potential to form one of the largest areas of natural forest and wetland habitat in Central Europe. This tourism offer is in keeping with visitor ' s preferences (identified in a 2010 survey), and can exploit global growth in ecotourism activity. The best access points to the Šumava NP ' s wilderness are currently regarded as being "full" in that further increases in visitors would damage the wilderness experience which draws visitors. Therefore, there is perceived to be demand for a larger number of carefully managed access points to a larger wilderness area. To maximise the local economic benefits of this tourism development around the park, appropriate training for the local workforce is required. Local benefits could be enhanced through nature-based tourism development that is spread throughout the communities in and around the park. This would not conflict wi...

Complex Comparison of Bavarian and Bohemian Forest National Parks from Geographical Perspective: Is there More Similarity or Difference?

“…In 2007 760 000 tourists visited the Bavarian Forest NP (Mayer & Job, 2008), in comparison ca. 2 000 000 tourists visited Bohemian Forest every year (Dickie & Whiteley, 2013;Perlín & Bičík, 2010). Despite this amount of people and income from tourism and obviously good label of the NP, mayors of Czech municipalities are not fully satisfied.…”

“…2). Emphasis on sustainable tourism can be one of the opportunity for further social and economic development of the area and it goes hand in hand with solving of "dichotomy problem" (Dickie & Whiteley, 2013). Sustainable development and tourism aiming at longer stay of tourists with wider offer of soft and ecologically friendly activities rather than building the big infrastructure (e.g.…”

“…Recent unclear and unstable situation do not guarantee any agreement. Municipalities in the Bohemian Forest can improve services for tourism and can try to attract tourist to stay for longer time (Dickie & Whiteley, 2013). We can see much more activity in this way in municipalities of Bavarian Forest (Mayer & Job, 2008).…”

Just how many obstacles are there to creating a National Park? A case study from the Šumava National Park

“…Thus the hope is that the good ideas that resulted in the establishment of the Šumava NP in the early 1990s, will eventually guide the discussions between local people, visitors, managers and politicians and result in them facing up to their responsibility for safeguarding this amazing island of wild nature. There are several interesting ideas for conserving wild nature and the people friendly management of the Šumava NP in the recent study "An Outline of Economic Impacts of Management Options for Šumava National Park" published by the reputable company EFTEC (Dickie 2014). They used social-economic data from the NP region to evaluate the economic effects of three management scenarios for the Šumava NP: (1) continuation of current management, (2) adoption of the new NP Act that would declassify protected areas and make areas available for development (e.g.…”

Transboundary Cooperation: The Best Way to Share Common Responsibility for Future

“…Bark beetle (Ips typographus) is the main pest species in any spruce forest. Bark beetles attack mature trees and infestation results in death of the tree [2]. Bark beetle outbreaks are therefore a natural feature of spruce forests in BFNP & ŠNP.…”