2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10806-018-9716-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of Engineering Approaches to Improving Agricultural Animal Welfare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal welfare is another important aspect related to food sustainability and safeguarding the environment [65,66]. The previous interpretation of a set of external requirements contributing to increasing cattle profitability has been substituted by a new consideration, i.e., animals are sentient beings [67].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal welfare is another important aspect related to food sustainability and safeguarding the environment [65,66]. The previous interpretation of a set of external requirements contributing to increasing cattle profitability has been substituted by a new consideration, i.e., animals are sentient beings [67].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though animals may still be necessary for cell supply, the techniques available to induce cells to proliferate indefinitely or even selection of cells that express immortality may reduce or avoid the need for new samples (Stephens et al, 2018). Nevertheless, the welfare of animals involved must be considered (Croney et al, 2018). As the number of animals demanded will be only a fraction of that required for slaughter-based meat production, the animals providing cells will probably be kept at higher welfare standards, as measured by accepted assessment protocols (Welfare Quality ® , 2009a,b,c) because of their extremely reduced numbers and their high value to the industry.…”
Section: Impact On Animal Ethics and Welfarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumers may be more accepting of gene editing in food animals if the technology focus is on animal health and welfare rather than on productivity (Frewer et al, 2013;Van Eenennaam and Young, 2018). Additionally, consumers may have fewer objections to gene editing of animals that involve genetic variants already naturally occurring in the species (e.g., polled in cattle) rather than if the genetic variant is inserted from a different species (Croney et al, 2018;Schultz-Bergin, 2018). An ethical review of genetically modified and gene-edited animals concluded that gene editing for polled "may be one of the least controversial applications" (Eriksson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Consumer Acceptancementioning
confidence: 99%