2016
DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2016.1152548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of seized illegal wildlife entering the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fish and Wildlife Law Enforcement inspectors to track the illicit trade of flora and fauna coming into and out of the United States. Findings from these studies suggest that a small number of export countries account for the majority of wildlife seizures entering the U.S. (Kurland and Pires 2017;Petrossian et al 2016;Goyenechea and Indenbaum 2015), and that a small number of entry points seize a disproportionate amount of wildlife contraband (Kurland and Pires 2017). Altogether, this research suggests hot routes are being used from particular countries to particular ports (Goyenechea and Indenbaum 2015).…”
Section: Crime Concentration: Does Illegal Wildlife Poaching and Tradmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fish and Wildlife Law Enforcement inspectors to track the illicit trade of flora and fauna coming into and out of the United States. Findings from these studies suggest that a small number of export countries account for the majority of wildlife seizures entering the U.S. (Kurland and Pires 2017;Petrossian et al 2016;Goyenechea and Indenbaum 2015), and that a small number of entry points seize a disproportionate amount of wildlife contraband (Kurland and Pires 2017). Altogether, this research suggests hot routes are being used from particular countries to particular ports (Goyenechea and Indenbaum 2015).…”
Section: Crime Concentration: Does Illegal Wildlife Poaching and Tradmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Not every species of wildlife is equally desired by humans, or even accessible, and as such, there is an expectation that poaching should be unevenly distributed among wildlife species (Pires and Clarke 2012). For example, wildlife seizures made at entry points in Asia (Nijman 2010), the EU (van Uhm 2016), and the US (Kurland and Pires 2017;Petrossian et al 2016) have found that certain taxonomic groups of wildlife are disproportionately trafficked into major demand markets while others are rarely seized. At the local level, market surveys commonly find particular species disproportionately sold in illicit markets (Gastanaga et al 2011;Herrera and Hennessey 2007;Lee et al 2005;Phelps and Webb 2015;Regueira and Bernard 2012) and field research has found certain wildlife is preferred for bushmeat by poachers (Holmern et al 2007).…”
Section: Crime Concentration: Does Illegal Wildlife Poaching and Tradmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alongside socio-cultural demand patterns, IWT is influenced by opportunity structures in the environment. A growing number of studies by criminologists examine IWT through the lens of environmental criminology [68][69][70][71][72]. (For a comprehensive overview of applying environmental criminology to IWT see Kurland and Pires [73] and Boratto and Gibbs [74]).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, little is known about the scale and mechanisms of IWT in the U. S. [18]. A handful of studies have analyzed illegal wildlife in the U.S. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]; yet the bulk of this literature examines broader international trafficking patterns [28][29] or focuses on a specific taxonomic group [30][31][32][33][34] and tend to be descriptive in nature, with a few exceptions [35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%