2005
DOI: 10.1080/14634980500411606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of the impact of non-indigenous species on the food web integrity of North American Great Lakes: Lake Erie example

Abstract: For the past several decades, the North American Great Lakes have suffered from eutrophication. The deteriorating state of the Great Lakes alarmed both the governments of Canada and the United States resulting in the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, which has brought about substantial improvements in water quality. While phosphorus abatement resulted in a significant decrease in nutrients, the sudden invasions of exotic species posed a serious threat to Great Lakes food webs. The zebra mussel (Dreissena po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This prediction is on par with recent empirical evidence that the microbial community (bacteria, autotrophic picoplankton, heterotrophic nanoflagellates, and ciliates) of the Hamilton Harbour constitutes an important vector of autochthonous energy transfer to higher trophic levels (e.g., Fitzpatrick et al, 2007;Munawar et al, 2005). Furthermore, the microbially mediated mineralization is likely to be an important supplier of bioavailable nutrients in the Harbour mixed layer and can largely determine the compliance of the system with the targeted water quality goals as the subsidies of phosphate associated with rapid nutrient turnover rates significantly modulate the epilimnetic phytoplankton dynamics and can conceivably cast doubt on the projected efficacy of the on-going restoration efforts (Gudimov et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ecosystem Attributessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This prediction is on par with recent empirical evidence that the microbial community (bacteria, autotrophic picoplankton, heterotrophic nanoflagellates, and ciliates) of the Hamilton Harbour constitutes an important vector of autochthonous energy transfer to higher trophic levels (e.g., Fitzpatrick et al, 2007;Munawar et al, 2005). Furthermore, the microbially mediated mineralization is likely to be an important supplier of bioavailable nutrients in the Harbour mixed layer and can largely determine the compliance of the system with the targeted water quality goals as the subsidies of phosphate associated with rapid nutrient turnover rates significantly modulate the epilimnetic phytoplankton dynamics and can conceivably cast doubt on the projected efficacy of the on-going restoration efforts (Gudimov et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ecosystem Attributessupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Although there are no conclusive data for Lake Ontario, it is probable that filter feeding by dreissenids has caused a shift in size distributions of phytoplankton, as observed in Lake Erie [e.g. Munawar et al (2005) suggested larger sized phytoplankton were being selectively grazed by dreissenids; Barbiero et al (2006) found that after the mussel invasion in eastern Lake Erie small centric diatoms increased while the larger taxa F. crotonensis and the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium declined]. Other studies also revealed that dreissenid impacts have shifted the Lake Ontario zooplankton balance.…”
Section: Main Lake Regionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Notably, Great Lakes yellow perch populations have withstood exploitation dating to the early 1900s, severe pollution in the 1950-60s, and biological invasions from the 1970s-present. Invasive species believed to have affected yellow perch populations include white perch Morone americana introduced in 1977 (Parrish and Margraf, 1990;Munawar et al, 2005), ruffe Gymnocephalus cernuus dating to 1985 (Pratt et al, 1992;Fullerton and Lamberti, 2006), and round goby Neogobius melanostomus since 1990 (Jude et al, 1992;Gonzalez, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%