Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Metals 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9346-1_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is, in part, based on a conference held in the summer of 1982 and sponsored by a subcommittee of the Permanent Commission and International Association on Occupational Health. This committee, the Scientific Committee on the Toxicology of Metals, produced an extensive review of this field (9), and we will attempt to update this information . We summarize both the effects and metabolism of metals as far as reproduction and development are concerned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, in part, based on a conference held in the summer of 1982 and sponsored by a subcommittee of the Permanent Commission and International Association on Occupational Health. This committee, the Scientific Committee on the Toxicology of Metals, produced an extensive review of this field (9), and we will attempt to update this information . We summarize both the effects and metabolism of metals as far as reproduction and development are concerned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a persistent environmental pol lutant of considerable developmental toxicity, cadmium deserves special attention [2,3]. During the early postna tal period the human being is most susceptible to heavy metal toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that there are many pathways. There are so many toxic exposures that reduce growth in mammals that physical growth is usually considered a general measure of toxicity (e.g., of metals; see Clarkson et al, 1983). It is unlikely therefore that a single biological pathway will be found to account for reduced growth in children exposed to the wide variety of chemical mixtures, as at Love Canal or in Taiwan and Japan.…”
Section: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%