2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10858-013-9750-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of tools for the validation of protein NMR structures

Abstract: Biomolecular structures at atomic resolution present a valuable resource for the understanding of biology. NMR spectroscopy accounts for 11% of all structures in the PDB repository. In response to serious problems with the accuracy of some of the NMR-derived structures and in order to facilitate proper analysis of the experimental models, a number of program suites are available. We discuss nine of these tools in this review: PROCHECK-NMR, PSVS, GLM-RMSD, CING, Molprobity, Vivaldi, ResProx, NMR constraints ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition the range of predicted global model reliability is 0 to 1 according to Verify 3D. Hence, Plasmodium falciparum transketolase with a global model reliability score 0.74 has all the potentials of a good quality model [5759]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition the range of predicted global model reliability is 0 to 1 according to Verify 3D. Hence, Plasmodium falciparum transketolase with a global model reliability score 0.74 has all the potentials of a good quality model [5759]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evaluation purposes, we used DFIRE [28], Verify3D [29], and Procheck [3031] programs. DFIRE is a statistical, potentialbased program that uses a distance-scaled finite ideal-gas reference state.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the per-residue RMSD is taken as a measure of local precision. Alternative measures of local or global precision include dihedral angle order parameters (DAOP) [55-57] and distance variance matrix methods [57-60] ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Which Parts Of the Structure Should Be Validated?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Web-based tools described in Table 2 include the CiNG [62,63], Molprobity [11], PSVS [10,14], Vivaldi [64], and ResProx [43] servers. These, as well as other programs for NMR structure quality assessment, have been critically reviewed in a recent publication [57]. The wwPDB NMR VTF has also recommended metrics and standards for biomolecular structure quality assessment [8,9], and these guidelines are being used in developing software pipelines that will generate standardized structure quality reports for all NMR and X-ray crystal structures submitted to the wwPDB.…”
Section: Protein Structure Quality Assessment Serversmentioning
confidence: 99%