2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ultraconserved Element (UCE) controls homeostatic splicing of ARGLU1 mRNA

Abstract: Arginine and Glutamate-Rich protein 1 (ARGLU1) is a protein whose function is poorly understood, but may act in both transcription and pre-mRNA splicing. We demonstrate that the ARGLU1 gene expresses at least three distinct RNA splice isoforms – a fully spliced isoform coding for the protein, an isoform containing a retained intron that is detained in the nucleus, and an isoform containing an alternative exon that targets the transcript for nonsense mediated decay. Furthermore, ARGLU1 contains a long, highly e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
7
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next used the Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT) (McLean et al, 2010) and discovered that exonic UCEs in pooled boundaries and pooled loop anchors are enriched for gene ontology (GO) terms associated with RNA processing (Figures S2A and S2B), and this is in line with previous reports that exonic UCEs are associated with RNA processing, including splicing (Baira et al, 2008; Bejerano et al, 2004; Lareau and Brenner, 2015; Lareau et al, 2007; Lupiáñez et al, 2016; Ni et al, 2007; Pirnie et al, 2017; Rödelsperger et al, 2009). Considering further the structure of exonic UCEs themselves, we found that 76% (16 out of 21; Table S5A) and 82% (43 out of 52; Table S5B) of exonic UCEs in pooled boundaries and loop anchors, respectively, partially overlap in-trons and hence cover splice sites, as compared to 57% in the full set of exonic UCEs (107 out of 185; Table S2E).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We next used the Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT) (McLean et al, 2010) and discovered that exonic UCEs in pooled boundaries and pooled loop anchors are enriched for gene ontology (GO) terms associated with RNA processing (Figures S2A and S2B), and this is in line with previous reports that exonic UCEs are associated with RNA processing, including splicing (Baira et al, 2008; Bejerano et al, 2004; Lareau and Brenner, 2015; Lareau et al, 2007; Lupiáñez et al, 2016; Ni et al, 2007; Pirnie et al, 2017; Rödelsperger et al, 2009). Considering further the structure of exonic UCEs themselves, we found that 76% (16 out of 21; Table S5A) and 82% (43 out of 52; Table S5B) of exonic UCEs in pooled boundaries and loop anchors, respectively, partially overlap in-trons and hence cover splice sites, as compared to 57% in the full set of exonic UCEs (107 out of 185; Table S2E).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We next used the Genomic Regions Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT) (47) and discovered that exonic UCEs in Pooled boundaries and Pooled loop anchors are enriched for GO terms associated with RNA processing ( Supplementary Figures S3A and S3B), and this is in line with previous reports that exonic UCEs are associated with RNA processing, including splicing (1,12,14,51,(97)(98)(99)(100). Considering further the structure of exonic UCEs, themselves, we found that 76% (16 out of 21; Supplementary Table S6A) and 82% (43 out of 52; Supplementary Table S6B) of exonic UCEs in Pooled boundaries and loop anchors, respectively, partially overlap introns and hence cover splice sites, as compared to 57% in the full set of exonic UCEs (107 out of 185; Supplementary Table 3C).…”
Section: When Uces Are Found In Boundaries and Loop Anchors They Shosupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This design was expected to maximize the likelihood of blocking spliceosome assembly at the decoy. However, it eliminated from consideration strong decoys in ARGLU1 and DDX39B that possess alternative splice sites distributed over a wider range (Parra M. et al 2018;Pirnie et al 2017). Finally, we targeted 5' splice sites, because the relatively low GC content at typical 3' splice sites was predicted to reduce MO affinity and effectiveness.…”
Section: Decoy Exon Targeting Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%