2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An uncertainty oriented fuzzy methodology for grade estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In global methods, the interpolation depends on all sample points, while the local interpolation methods depend only on the data in its neighborhood [4]. Additionally, artificial neural networks [14], fuzzy methodology [15,16], evolutionary algorithms [17], support vector machines [18], and fractal models [19] have also been used to estimate the grade of the mineralized deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In global methods, the interpolation depends on all sample points, while the local interpolation methods depend only on the data in its neighborhood [4]. Additionally, artificial neural networks [14], fuzzy methodology [15,16], evolutionary algorithms [17], support vector machines [18], and fractal models [19] have also been used to estimate the grade of the mineralized deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mining investment costs can be decreased using feasible grade estimation methods. Grade estimation contains many uncertainties, which may be due to the sampling, the natural characteristics of an ore deposit, and the analytical error of the chemical and mineralogical analyses (Tütmez 2007). This uncertainty factor in grade estimation leads to the need to develop new estimation methodologies by which financiers and managers can be assisted in evaluating their mining projects with a minimum risk of incorrect prediction (Pham 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods such as geometrical and geostatistical approaches have been developed for the purpose of grade estimation. Geometrical methods (David 1977) depend on geometrical relationships between sample points, while geostatistical methods (Journel & Huijbregts 1981;Goovaerts 1997) are based on random functions and consider spatial relationship of the sample data used in the analysis (Tütmez 2007). The most important shortcoming of the geostatistical methods is the amount of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations