2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unfitted RBF-FD method in a least-squares setting for elliptic PDEs on complex geometries

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related work is [25] where we introduced an oversampled version of the RBF-FD method for an elliptic model problem, and made a theoretical investigation of its stability properties, where we showed that the RBF-FD method generates a discontinuous trial space and that oversampling of a stationary problem approximates a variational formulation using a least-squares projection. The oversampled RBF-FD method was then also extended to an unfitted setting in [24], which was later used for the simulations of a thoracic diaphragm in [27]. In [26] we introduced the oversampled RBF-FD method to solve nonlinear conservation laws with discontinuous solutions, and found that oversampling approximates a strong variational formulation using a Galerkin projection, but the method is still unstable in time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related work is [25] where we introduced an oversampled version of the RBF-FD method for an elliptic model problem, and made a theoretical investigation of its stability properties, where we showed that the RBF-FD method generates a discontinuous trial space and that oversampling of a stationary problem approximates a variational formulation using a least-squares projection. The oversampled RBF-FD method was then also extended to an unfitted setting in [24], which was later used for the simulations of a thoracic diaphragm in [27]. In [26] we introduced the oversampled RBF-FD method to solve nonlinear conservation laws with discontinuous solutions, and found that oversampling approximates a strong variational formulation using a Galerkin projection, but the method is still unstable in time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 2 we report the condition number κ(M) of the interpolation matrix and the constant Λ I , defined in equation (24), against the angle α in the case of the reference stencil of Figure 1. Whenever one of these quantities grows unbounded, we have a very ill-conditioned system in equation (17), which translates into large errors and most likely stability issues.…”
Section: Preliminary Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22,23,24] the stabilization is achieved through different least squares procedures. The one in [24] seems especially capable of providing both stable and accurate results by using two different node sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mathematical formulation for computing these weights is given in [33,8]. In this paper we use these approaches to generate a vector of weights for every y ∈ Y , such that the weights are exact for a cubic polyharmonic spline basis and a monomial basis of degree p, which is a concept introduced in [34] and studied in [35,36,37,38].…”
Section: Evaluation and Differentiation Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 16 and Figure 17, we display the convergence under node refinement, in 2-norm and 1norm respectively, where the norms are defined in (33). The optimal convergence rates are expected to be 0.5 and 1.…”
Section: Numerical Study Ii: Burger's Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%