2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3528206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Unintended Effect of Financing the University Education of the Most Brilliant and Poorest Colombian Students: The Case of the Intervention of the Ser Pilo Paga Program

Abstract: In this paper, we show an unintended effect of the program Ser Pilo Paga (SPP) that was a flagship program of the Colombian government between 2014 and 2018. It was designed as an intervention in the Colombian Higher Education System (CHES) by awarding, in the steady state, individual funding to about 40,000 students. Every year, 10,000 new students were chosen from the best applicants in the top decile of the population in the entrance exam to higher education in Colombia that also came from families that liv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third factor that has jeopardized the legitimacy of the EQA policy relates to the contradictions arising from the connections between accreditations and the new funding mechanisms, particularly the program Ser Pilo Paga [15] (SPP), which has led to an ongoing dispute between the program’s supporters and its detractors. Program supporters have defended the positive impact that the program has on the students who benefited from SPP and its impact on the educational system as a whole (Medina et al , 2018), whereas program detractors argue that the program was not cost-effective and worsened the financial crisis of public institutions (Mora and Múnera, 2019). Regardless, it is clear from an EQA policy perspective that this relationship has undermined the original conceptualization of the model of accreditations, as institutional accreditations have become unofficial obligations for institutions that wish to benefit from indirect public funding [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third factor that has jeopardized the legitimacy of the EQA policy relates to the contradictions arising from the connections between accreditations and the new funding mechanisms, particularly the program Ser Pilo Paga [15] (SPP), which has led to an ongoing dispute between the program’s supporters and its detractors. Program supporters have defended the positive impact that the program has on the students who benefited from SPP and its impact on the educational system as a whole (Medina et al , 2018), whereas program detractors argue that the program was not cost-effective and worsened the financial crisis of public institutions (Mora and Múnera, 2019). Regardless, it is clear from an EQA policy perspective that this relationship has undermined the original conceptualization of the model of accreditations, as institutional accreditations have become unofficial obligations for institutions that wish to benefit from indirect public funding [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPP demand‐based subsidy program covered about 40,000 students' tuitions and some of their living expenses in the university of the students' choice as long as they were admitted, and fulfilled the required academic and socioeconomic criteria (Medina et al., 2018). Most of them chose private universities for different reasons, one of them being their perceived higher status.…”
Section: The Casementioning
confidence: 99%