2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4905449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unshielded radio-frequency atomic magnetometer with sub-femtoTesla sensitivity

Abstract: We demonstrate a radio-frequency potassium-vapor magnetometer operating with sensitivities of 0.3 fT/Hz at 0.5 MHz and 0.9 fT/Hz at 1.31 MHz in the absence of radio-frequency and mu-metal or magnetic shielding. The use of spatially separated magnetometers, two voxels within the same cell, permits for the subtraction of common mode noise and the retention of a gradient signal, as from a local source. At 0.5 MHz the common mode noise was white and measured to be 3.4 fT/Hz; upon subtraction the noise returned to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of the atomic magnetometers can easily be taken advantage of in shielded enclosures, but many applications, like NQR used for the detection of illicit substances, would be more fieldable if done unshielded. It has been shown that the superior sensitivity of the RF magnetometer can be retained unshielded if operated with two effective sensors and used as a gradiometer [24]. In that work, however, the two sensors were two channels within a larger cell and represented a baseline of only 2 cm; more recently, a similar gradiometer measurement was made with separate sensors 5.6 cm apart, but at a much lower frequency and worse sensitivity [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the atomic magnetometers can easily be taken advantage of in shielded enclosures, but many applications, like NQR used for the detection of illicit substances, would be more fieldable if done unshielded. It has been shown that the superior sensitivity of the RF magnetometer can be retained unshielded if operated with two effective sensors and used as a gradiometer [24]. In that work, however, the two sensors were two channels within a larger cell and represented a baseline of only 2 cm; more recently, a similar gradiometer measurement was made with separate sensors 5.6 cm apart, but at a much lower frequency and worse sensitivity [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum is flat when the RF supply is off (V RF =0), while the central peak and sidebands appear as soon as the voltage increases (see top inset). Given the proof-of-principle nature of the present work and taking into consideration data reported in literature on atomic magnetometers [8][9][10][11][12], one can anticipate a great potential for a further increase in detection capability and range.…”
Section: Response Versus Rf Power and Target Distancementioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the use of a gradiometer for interference mitigation inherently lowers sensitivity to the NQR response 24,25 . RF atomic magnetometers offer a unique alternative to coil based gradiometers for RFI mitigation and the potential for significant enhancement in interference cancellation 11 . Since magnetometers act as independent sensors, background subtraction of interference can be performed without suffering any loss in the detected NQR signal.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise floor of an optically pumped atomic magnetometer is limited by the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle resulting in an order of magnitude improvement in sensitivity over an inductive coil 8,9,10 . Furthermore, multiple magnetometers can be arranged in an array to mitigate RFI by background subtraction of interference without the mutual inductive coupling issues or sensitivity degradation that plagued inductive sensors 11 . In this paper, we present results from a proof-of-principle breadboard experiment utilizing RF atomic magnetometers with sub-femtotesla sensitivity in the 400 kHz to 5 MHz frequency range for detection of NQR signals from explosive simulants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%