2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unstable truth: how massive stars get their mass

Abstract: The pressure exerted by massive stars' radiation fields is an important mechanism regulating their formation. Detailed simulation of massive star formation therefore requires an accurate treatment of radiation. However, all published simulations have either used a diffusion approximation of limited validity; have only been able to simulate a single star fixed in space, thereby suppressing potentially-important instabilities; or did not provide adequate resolution at locations where instabilities may develop. T… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
190
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(196 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
6
190
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it remains an open question as to what exact extent disk fragmentation contributes to the multiplicity properties of high-mass star forming regions. Disk formation and fragmentation around forming massive protostars has been studied in only a few three-dimensional simulation studies which include radiation transport to properly render the thermodynamics of the (un)stable disk (Krumholz et al 2007(Krumholz et al , 2009Kuiper et al 2011;Rosen et al 2016;Klassen et al 2016;Meyer et al 2017Meyer et al , 2018Rosen et al 2019).…”
Section: Gravitational Instability In Massive Protostellar Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it remains an open question as to what exact extent disk fragmentation contributes to the multiplicity properties of high-mass star forming regions. Disk formation and fragmentation around forming massive protostars has been studied in only a few three-dimensional simulation studies which include radiation transport to properly render the thermodynamics of the (un)stable disk (Krumholz et al 2007(Krumholz et al , 2009Kuiper et al 2011;Rosen et al 2016;Klassen et al 2016;Meyer et al 2017Meyer et al , 2018Rosen et al 2019).…”
Section: Gravitational Instability In Massive Protostellar Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the most recent, sophisticated star formation models are not able to simulate the fine detail required to probe the accretion process from parsec scales via an accretion disk to the stellar surface. For example, Rosen et al (2016) explicitly mention that the material is not followed in the inner 80 au. Given that our spectropolarimetric evidence points towards circumstellar disks that are present at very small scales, the logical, direct conclusion we can draw is that the disk is not truncated, but reaches all the way down to the stellar surface.…”
Section: On the Formation Of Intermediate And Massive Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these models produce a highmass star with enough luminosity to halt further spherical accretion at a very early stage, with *~ -MM 10 20 . Radiation pressure provides a fundamental limit on how much mass can be accreted (Wolfire & Cassinelli 1987;Osorio et al 1999), but geometric effects can circumvent this limit and allow further accretion (Yorke & Sonnhalter 2002;Krumholz et al 2005Krumholz & Matzner 2009;Kuiper & Yorke 2013;Rosen et al 2016). Additionally, fragmentationinduced starvation can limit the amount of mass available to the most massive star, instead breaking up massive cores into many lower-mass fragments (Peters et al 2010b;Girichidis et al 2012), though other simulations suggest that feedback should suppress this fragmentation (Myers 2013;Krumholz et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%