2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual adverse reaction to iodine-based contrast agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although recurrence of iodine mumps may occur, the reaction clearly is not a contrast allergy and premedication protocols are not warranted. Analgesia may be helpful as gland tenderness was a dominant symptom in multiple cases (27,46,47), but overall there was no statistically significant difference in days to symptom resolution for those who received therapeutic intervention versus those who did not in our results; this may also explain why prophylaxis was ineffective in patients who had recurrence after repeat contrast administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Although recurrence of iodine mumps may occur, the reaction clearly is not a contrast allergy and premedication protocols are not warranted. Analgesia may be helpful as gland tenderness was a dominant symptom in multiple cases (27,46,47), but overall there was no statistically significant difference in days to symptom resolution for those who received therapeutic intervention versus those who did not in our results; this may also explain why prophylaxis was ineffective in patients who had recurrence after repeat contrast administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%