2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An updated version of the multimechanism model for cyclic plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of numerical algorithms the setting in (22) (leading to (25)) is more suitable than the approach (26).…”
Section: Remark 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of numerical algorithms the setting in (22) (leading to (25)) is more suitable than the approach (26).…”
Section: Remark 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a "competition" between Chaboche like models and 2M models (cf. [3,9] for further references). Clearly, experiments must decide, which approach is better in which situation.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6], e.g.). Their characteristic trait is the additive decomposition of the inelastic (i.e., plastic or visco-plastic, e.g.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research on the behaviour of various engineering materials under low cycle fatigue conditions has been carried out for the last 50 years in order to develop the adequate constitutive modeling as well as the appropriate predictions of the fatigue lifetime (Taleb et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2008;Ganczarski and Skrzypek, 2009;Taleb and Cailletaud, 2010;Skrzypek and Ganczarski, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%