2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2008.03908.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An upper-mantle upwelling underneath Ireland revealed from non-linear tomography

Abstract: SUMMARY We present results of a non‐linear teleseismic P‐wave traveltime tomography in Ireland. Relative traveltime residuals are calculated from the data set of the Irish Seismological Lithospheric Experiment (ISLE 2002/3) and permanent stations onshore Ireland. At each of the 28 station sites, a local crustal 1‐D P‐wave velocity (vP) model is determined because the 3‐D crustal vP structure of Ireland is well known. These 1‐D models are used for a traveltime correction for crustal effects. The corrected resid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The voluminous volcanism in northern Ireland is considered a part of the NAVP (White 1988; White & Lovell 1997; Arrowsmith et al 2005). The low velocities beneath Ireland—the western extremity of Europe—may be related to the opening of the North Atlantic, the Iceland Hotspot activity and episodic Cenozoic magmatism in the region (Rohrman & van der Beek 1996; Wawerzinek et al 2008; O’Donnell et al 2011; Polat et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussion Of the 3‐d Upper‐mantle S‐wave Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voluminous volcanism in northern Ireland is considered a part of the NAVP (White 1988; White & Lovell 1997; Arrowsmith et al 2005). The low velocities beneath Ireland—the western extremity of Europe—may be related to the opening of the North Atlantic, the Iceland Hotspot activity and episodic Cenozoic magmatism in the region (Rohrman & van der Beek 1996; Wawerzinek et al 2008; O’Donnell et al 2011; Polat et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussion Of the 3‐d Upper‐mantle S‐wave Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent adjoint waveform propagation tomography model in Europe exhibits fast upper mantle shear wave speeds in the eastern margins of Scotland and England and southwestern Irish margin, whereas slow upper mantle is restricted to the S-W English peninsula (Zhu et al, 2015). Local seismic p-wave tomography studies are characterized by relatively moderate lateral variations in the seismic velocities across Ireland, with positive lithospheric anomalies in the western area (e.g., Wawerzinek et al, 2008;O'Donnell et al, 2011). In Great Britain, a local V p travel time tomography model suggests positive velocity anomalies in S-E England and S-E Scotland and negative anomalies in the Irish Sea, western Scotland, southern Wales margin and S-W English peninsula (Arrowsmith et al, 2005).…”
Section: Geological and Geophysical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VanDecar et al, 1995;Faccenna and Beker, 2010). For example, low relative wave speeds beneath the British Isles have been used to argue for hot, partially molten plume material with a temperature anomaly of 200°C (Arrowsmith et al, 2005;Wawerzinek et al, 2008). Low relative wave speeds below~200 km under the Siberian Craton (Fig.…”
Section: Translating the Results To Other Physical Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include proposals that the British Isles are underlain by hot plume material (e.g. Arrowsmith et al ., ; Wawerzinek et al ., ), that plumes underlie several islands in the Indian Ocean (Montelli et al ., ,b), that a plume feeding Hawaii is rooted variously to the NW, or the SE of the Big Island (Li et al ., ; Wolfe et al ., ), and that sodic alkaline‐to‐tholeiitic continental and oceanic mid‐plate magmatism requires thermal anomalies (Ritter et al ., ; Piromallo et al ., ). The assumption that low seismic wave speeds indicate hot material has led to proposals that sub‐lithospheric channels up to thousands of kilometres long connect volcanic regions thought to have similar geochemical signatures (e.g.…”
Section: Implications For the Geochemical And Geodynamic Models Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation