1991
DOI: 10.1080/00908329109545952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anadromous species and the new international law of the sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 In accordance to Article 66 of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, the states in whose rivers these stocks originate shall have the "primary interest in and responsibility for such stocks," a provision that extends to the management of salmon in the high seas with only minor restrictions relating to the cooperation with other states concerned.…”
Section: Anadromous and Catadromous Speciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…23 In accordance to Article 66 of the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, the states in whose rivers these stocks originate shall have the "primary interest in and responsibility for such stocks," a provision that extends to the management of salmon in the high seas with only minor restrictions relating to the cooperation with other states concerned.…”
Section: Anadromous and Catadromous Speciesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One could argue that cooperative management of Pacific salmon harvests should have been an easy case. During the UN Third Conference on the Law of the Sea, Canada and the United States joined forces to push for adoption of Article 66 of the UNCLOS, which effectively banned directed high seas fishing for salmon (United Nations ; Burke ). This largely eliminated Russian and Japanese interceptions of North American salmon and left Canada and the United States free to jointly manage their salmon stocks as “transboundary” fishery resources.…”
Section: Implications For International Fisheries Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many respects, Canada and the US are well situated to achieve cooperative management of these fisheries. During the UN Third Conference on the Law of the Sea, Canada and the US cooperated in insisting that the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Article 66 be adopted, which effectively banned directed high-seas fishing for salmon (Burke 1991;United Nations 1982). This largely eliminated Russian and Japanese interceptions of North American salmon and left Canada and the US free to jointly manage their salmon stocks as "transboundary" fishery resources.…”
Section: Pacific Salmon: a Cautionary Talementioning
confidence: 99%