2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic co-digestion of sugarcane press mud with vinasse on methane yield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the OLR increased from 0.25 to 1.0 g COD/L·d, the methane production rate (MPR) of RM gradually increased from 86.5 to 249.0 mL/L·d, whereas the methane yield (MY; per substrate COD fed) decreased from 320 to 230 mL/g COD fed (Table 1). Nevertheless, the MY values are still reasonable and comparable to those previously reported in mesophilic digesters treating sulfur-rich feedstocks including Ulva biomass [21,27,28], and MY often tends to decrease with increasing OLR [29][30][31]. On the other hand, the MPR of RT gradually increased from 57.3 to 156.0 mL/L·d with increasing OLR from 0.25 to 0.75 g COD/L·d, but a further increase in OLR to 1.0 g COD/L·d caused a significant drop in MPR to 33.1 mL/L·d.…”
Section: Methanogenic Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As the OLR increased from 0.25 to 1.0 g COD/L·d, the methane production rate (MPR) of RM gradually increased from 86.5 to 249.0 mL/L·d, whereas the methane yield (MY; per substrate COD fed) decreased from 320 to 230 mL/g COD fed (Table 1). Nevertheless, the MY values are still reasonable and comparable to those previously reported in mesophilic digesters treating sulfur-rich feedstocks including Ulva biomass [21,27,28], and MY often tends to decrease with increasing OLR [29][30][31]. On the other hand, the MPR of RT gradually increased from 57.3 to 156.0 mL/L·d with increasing OLR from 0.25 to 0.75 g COD/L·d, but a further increase in OLR to 1.0 g COD/L·d caused a significant drop in MPR to 33.1 mL/L·d.…”
Section: Methanogenic Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, these practices can affect soil porosity, generate bad odours, and contaminate water sources due to the presence of fats and organic compounds in the SPM. e general composition of the SPM demonstrates its potential for the production of renewable energy through anaerobic digestion (AD) [5,6]; however, being formed by a lignocellulosic structure, avoids the solubilisation of nutrients for absorption by microorganisms [7] and affects its degradability, being the hydrolysis the limiting stage [8]. To solve this problem, physical, mechanical, and chemical pretreatments and combinations of these have been carried out; however, they are costly alternatives that require specialized equipment and qualified personnel or can generate toxic by-products [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperatures chosen for aging were 38ºC which is believed to be subsurface temperature, 65ºC is the temperature between surface temperature and bottom hole temperature and 93ºC is the maximum permissible temperatures for water based mud to perform rheological test so as to avoid degradation of polymers [16,17]. Temperature of 49ºC was taken as standard temperature to measure rheological properties of the mud [18] after aging.…”
Section: Aging Processmentioning
confidence: 99%