2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic degradation of glycol ether-ethanol mixtures using EGSB and hybrid reactors: Performance comparison and ether cleavage pathway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change to continuous feeding caused an accumulation of E2P in R1, but at the end of the study E2P removal was > 80%. Intermediate products associated with the anaerobic degradation pathway of E2P are acetone from the ether cleavage and isopropanol from the reversible reduction of acetone in the presence of H 2 [ 27 ]. Both intermediates were detected at low concentrations (acetone < 30 mg COD L −1 ; isopropanol < 20 mg COD L −1 ), thus indicating that the production of the enzyme required for ether cleavage was the limiting step.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change to continuous feeding caused an accumulation of E2P in R1, but at the end of the study E2P removal was > 80%. Intermediate products associated with the anaerobic degradation pathway of E2P are acetone from the ether cleavage and isopropanol from the reversible reduction of acetone in the presence of H 2 [ 27 ]. Both intermediates were detected at low concentrations (acetone < 30 mg COD L −1 ; isopropanol < 20 mg COD L −1 ), thus indicating that the production of the enzyme required for ether cleavage was the limiting step.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] The anaerobic hybrid (AH) reactor has a unique configuration, as it integrates the advantages of the UASB and anaerobic filter (AF) reactors for its lower and upper zones, respectively. [17][18][19][20] The supporting media (such as nylon fiber, polyurethane foam or plastic cut rings) are installed at the upper part of the AH reactor, acting as a packed zone, whereas microbial granulation occurs in the sludge zone (bottom part) of the reactor, similar to that in the UASB reactor. The packed zone of the AH reactor is considered the zone for microbial attachment in the form of biofilms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last three decades, several research groups have isolated microorganisms capable of attacking PU (Oceguera-Cervantes et al, 2007;Cregut et al, 2013;Álvarez-Barragán et al, 2016;Gamerith et al, 2016;Osman et al, 2018;Magnin et al, 2019) and degrading xenobiotic additives (Ojo, 2007;Varsha et al, 2011). Also, the degradation capabilities of several fungal and bacterial communities over PU in compost, soil or liquid cultures (Zafar et al, 2014;Shah et al, 2016;Vargas-Suárez et al, 2019), and over some xenobiotics in different activated sludges (Ferrero et al, 2018) have been assessed. However, PU biodegradation is still a challenge for environmental and biological disciplines and little is known about structure or potential degradative enzymatic pathways of microbial communities capable of PU biodegradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%