“…Regardless of whether states have a formal program or not, however, the challenge still remains of how to deal with this chlorinated solvent contamination.While reductive dechlorination of PCE and TCE has been studied extensively (see, for example, Alvarez-Cohen & McCarty, 1991;Baek & Jaffe, 1989;Barbee, 1994;Bradley & Chapelle, 1997;Carr & Hughes, 1998;Davis & Carpenter, 1990;Dolan & McCarty, 1995;Freedman & Gossett, 1989;Jenal-Wanner & McCarty, 1997;Kleopfer et al, 1985;McCarty, 1997;Sewell & Gibson, 1991;Suarez & Rifai, 1999;Vogel & McCarty, 1985;Weaver et al, 1996;Wiedemeier et al, 1996Wiedemeier et al, , 1999, the behavior of chlorinated solvent plumes over time and their remediation are not as well understood as fuel hydrocarbons. Studies similar to those completed by Rice et al (1995a, b) and Mace et al (1997) for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX) are needed to better characterize the overall magnitude of the dry-cleaner problem and to develop an understanding of the potential for natural attenuation of the chlorinated solvents.The studies by Rice et al (1995a, b) and Mace et al (1997) prompted significant changes in state UST programs such as risk-based remediation and increased reliance on natural attenuation for managing low-risk sites.…”