2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of leachates from Jebel Chakir discharge in Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soluble chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined according to the method of Knechtel (1978). The five-day biological oxygen demand (BOD 5 ) was determined by the manometric method using a respirometer (OxiTop Ò Box) a described by Zayen et al (2010). Total organic carbon was determined after dry combustion using a TOC analyzer -V CPH , SHIMADZU (Gouider et al 2010).…”
Section: Physicochemical Analyses and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soluble chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined according to the method of Knechtel (1978). The five-day biological oxygen demand (BOD 5 ) was determined by the manometric method using a respirometer (OxiTop Ò Box) a described by Zayen et al (2010). Total organic carbon was determined after dry combustion using a TOC analyzer -V CPH , SHIMADZU (Gouider et al 2010).…”
Section: Physicochemical Analyses and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment efficiency was high with an average COD reduction of 90% and biogas yield of 0.46 l biogas per g COD removed [4]. To reduce the membrane fouling and strengthen performance of the AnMBR, adding filter was reported to be a promising option, it has been confirmed that adding granular activated carbon (GAC) to an AnMBR resulted in a reduction in the cake layer resistance by approximately 53.5% [7] [51].…”
Section: Anmbr Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence several studies examined the anMBR performance for the treatment of leachate or leachate-WW mixture under various operating conditions (i.e. SRT, HRT, temperature, OLR, flux…; Xie et al 2014;Zayen et al 2015;Taskan and Hasar 2012;Trzcinski et al 2011;Zayen et al 2010;Trzcinski and Stuckey 2009a, b;Bohdziewicz et al 2008; while others investigated the accompanying microbial populations Trzcinski and Stuckey 2012). Although AnMBRs reportedly tolerate higher ammonium concentration than aerobic MBR (Taskan and Hasar 2012), they are more prone to fouling than the latter (Saddoud and Sayadi 2007), hence the flux decline during operation (Taskan and Hasar 2012) in addition to the need for frequent cleaning were reportedly the most limiting factors in the application of anMBRs.…”
Section: Variations In Mbr Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%