2010
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.74613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaesthetic considerations in a patient with von recklinghausen neurofibromatosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salviz used an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block for excision of neurofibroma, while Bagam and his team used a brachial plexus block in a 60-year-old NF1 patients who needed an intramedullary interlocking nail for her humerus. 14,15 Given this patient's neurofibromatosis throughout her trunk and upper extremities, and the demonstrated success and safety of peripheral nerve blocks in previous reports, a decision to proceed with an upper extremity nerve block was made. A systematic sonographic survey of all suitable block sites in this patient was initially performed prior to obtain valuable information on the morphology of the nerves, vessels, and presence of any peripheral neurofibroma previously described in literature as hypoechoic structures with posterior acoustic enhancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salviz used an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular nerve block for excision of neurofibroma, while Bagam and his team used a brachial plexus block in a 60-year-old NF1 patients who needed an intramedullary interlocking nail for her humerus. 14,15 Given this patient's neurofibromatosis throughout her trunk and upper extremities, and the demonstrated success and safety of peripheral nerve blocks in previous reports, a decision to proceed with an upper extremity nerve block was made. A systematic sonographic survey of all suitable block sites in this patient was initially performed prior to obtain valuable information on the morphology of the nerves, vessels, and presence of any peripheral neurofibroma previously described in literature as hypoechoic structures with posterior acoustic enhancement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%