2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2995.2000.00002.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anaesthetic potency of isoflurane in cattle: determination of the minimum alveolar concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These values were lower than those found by Garcia-Pereira et al 14 Following termination of anesthetic maintenance and CRI, all calves recovered uneventufully and no adverse effects were observed at recovery. Nevertheless, recovery time was greater than that observed by Cantalapietra et al 16 , which reported a mean of 4.6 minutes to sternal recumbency and 6.7 minutes to standing position in cattle anaesthetized with 1 MAC of isoflurane for 90 minutes.…”
contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…These values were lower than those found by Garcia-Pereira et al 14 Following termination of anesthetic maintenance and CRI, all calves recovered uneventufully and no adverse effects were observed at recovery. Nevertheless, recovery time was greater than that observed by Cantalapietra et al 16 , which reported a mean of 4.6 minutes to sternal recumbency and 6.7 minutes to standing position in cattle anaesthetized with 1 MAC of isoflurane for 90 minutes.…”
contrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The results of this study suggest that the use of lidocaine CRI at 50 mg kg −1 minute −1 in calves undergoing umbilical surgery reduces the required concentration of isoflurane by approximately 17%. There appears to be no published minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane for calves, but in adult cattle it is 1.14% (Cantalapiedra et al. 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ruminants, isoflurane has an induction concentration of 3-5% and an anesthetic concentration of 1.5-3% [7], while sevoflurane has an induction concentration of 4-6% and an anesthetic concentration of 2.5-4% [14,31]. In this study, the concentration of isoflurane was 2.3% (2-5) and that of sevoflurane was 4.07% (3-5) for surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%