2017
DOI: 10.12962/jh.v2i1.4401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisa Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Nakayasu Dan ITB Pada Sub DAS Konto, Jawa Timur

Abstract: Perhitungan debit banjir rencana merupakan suatu bagian yang sangat penting dalam merencanakan bangunan air. Dengan perencanaan debit banjir yang tepat dan sesuai akan menyebabkan pembangunan sarana prasarana keairan menjadi efektif dan efisien serta dapat mengurangi resiko akan kegagalan bangunan akibat bencana alam seperti banjir. Selain pemilihan periode ulang rencana yang tepat sesuai dengan resiko yang akan dihadapi oleh suatu bangunan keairan, dalam perhitungan debit banjir rencana juga diperlukan metode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 describes the 4 frequency distributions with a normal distribution resulting in R2 of 94.10 mm; R5 of 110.70; R10 for 119.40 mm; R25 of 127.86 mm; R50 of 134.62 mm; R100 is 140.15 mm, log normal distribution produces R2 of 92.20 mm; R5 of 110.42; R10 of 121.36 mm; R25 of 133.04 mm; R50 of 143.18 mm; R100 of 152.05 mm, pearson III log distribution produces R2 of 92.58 mm; R5 of 110.54 mm; R10 of 121.25 mm; R25 of 133.38 mm; R50 of 141.56 mm; R100 is 149.30 mm, the Gumbel distribution produces R2 of 91.40 mm; R5 of 115.24 mm; R10 of 131.02 mm; R25 of 150.96 mm; R50 of 165.75 mm; R100 is 180.43 mm, then the goodness of fit test method is tested with the dispersion test of the skewness coefficient value of 0.0505 <1.1396, the kurtosis coefficient of 1.8641 <5,4002, the Kolmograov and Smirnov distribution test obtained a Dmax value of 0.1643 <Dcr of 0.32, and the chi squared test (χh2 count of 1 <χh2 Critical of 5.991 is used to analyze flood discharge times using the Nakayashu method with a river basin area of 298.89 km2 with a flow coefficient (Cw DAS langsa ) of 0.48 and the length of the river is 62.8 km with the assumption of rain for 6 hours [14] with a rain ratio of 55% for the 1st hour, 15% for the second hour, 11% for the 3rd hour and 5 by 7%, and the 6th hour of 5% produces runoff discharge during the HSS Nakayashu plan in Figure 4. [19] where the estimated flood impact and flood risk costs are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 describes the 4 frequency distributions with a normal distribution resulting in R2 of 94.10 mm; R5 of 110.70; R10 for 119.40 mm; R25 of 127.86 mm; R50 of 134.62 mm; R100 is 140.15 mm, log normal distribution produces R2 of 92.20 mm; R5 of 110.42; R10 of 121.36 mm; R25 of 133.04 mm; R50 of 143.18 mm; R100 of 152.05 mm, pearson III log distribution produces R2 of 92.58 mm; R5 of 110.54 mm; R10 of 121.25 mm; R25 of 133.38 mm; R50 of 141.56 mm; R100 is 149.30 mm, the Gumbel distribution produces R2 of 91.40 mm; R5 of 115.24 mm; R10 of 131.02 mm; R25 of 150.96 mm; R50 of 165.75 mm; R100 is 180.43 mm, then the goodness of fit test method is tested with the dispersion test of the skewness coefficient value of 0.0505 <1.1396, the kurtosis coefficient of 1.8641 <5,4002, the Kolmograov and Smirnov distribution test obtained a Dmax value of 0.1643 <Dcr of 0.32, and the chi squared test (χh2 count of 1 <χh2 Critical of 5.991 is used to analyze flood discharge times using the Nakayashu method with a river basin area of 298.89 km2 with a flow coefficient (Cw DAS langsa ) of 0.48 and the length of the river is 62.8 km with the assumption of rain for 6 hours [14] with a rain ratio of 55% for the 1st hour, 15% for the second hour, 11% for the 3rd hour and 5 by 7%, and the 6th hour of 5% produces runoff discharge during the HSS Nakayashu plan in Figure 4. [19] where the estimated flood impact and flood risk costs are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic Unit Hydrograph (HSS) Nakayasu (1950) has investigated the Japanese unit hydrograph and provided a set of equations to form a unit hydrograph as follows [6,11,14,15]: tg = 0 4 + 0.058 x L (untuk L > 15 km ) ( 7) tg = 0.21 x L 0.7 ( untuk L < 15 km ) (…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indonesia merupakan negara tropis sehingga memiliki karakteristik DAS dan curah hujan yang sangat berbeda dengan daerah tempat ketiga model tersebut dirumuskan, sehingga hasil analisis yang diperoleh kurang optimal (Tunas, 2019). Di Indonesia model hidrograf juga mulai dikembangkan oleh beberapa peneliti maupun akademisi seperti Gama 1, Limantara, ITB-1, ITB-2, ITS-1 dan yang terbaru ITS-2 (Margini, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…A hydrograph must be adjusted by observing and analyzing hydrology to determine the characteristics in a watershed. Some popular hydrograph methods include ITB, GAMA-1, SCS, ITS-1, ITS-2 and Nakayasu [1]. The method used in this study is Nakayasu Synthetic Unit Hydrograph method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%