2018
DOI: 10.22219/jiko.v3i02.7041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analisis Added Value Program Kawasan Rumah Pangan Lestari (KRPL) terhadap Ekonomi Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus Pada Kelompok Wanita Tani “DEWI SRI” Kota Batu)

Abstract: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis adanya nilai tambah dari kegiatan kawasan rumah pangan lestari (KRPL) terhadap ekonomi keluarga. Pada dasarnya KRPL yang didukung oleh Dinas Pertanian dan Dinas Ketahanan Pangan Kota Batu ini bertujuan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan pangan dari setiap anggotanya dengan cara menanam tanaman pangan organik sehingga kebutuhan pangan rumah tangga dapat dipenuhi dengan kegiatan tersebut. Metode yang digunaan dari penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif dengan t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It reduced the budget used for vegetable purchases (Amran et al, 2016). Similar to this finding, vegetables and medicinal plants in the house yard had increased the level of household income in Bandung Regency (Hidayat, 2017), Batu City (Syam et al, 2018), Gianyar Regency (Oka et al, 2016), Kediri City (Annisahaq et al, 2014), Mimika Regency (Patadungan, 2019), Semarang City (Kusumaningsih & Tyas, 2019), Sintang Regency (Rini et al, 2019), Southeast Sulawesi (Tando, 2018), and Yogyakarta (Werdhany & Gunawan, 2012). The effectiveness and profitable effect of the program depended on farmers' knowledge, availability of land, and the duration of cultivation (Sukanata et al, 2015), demographic characteristics of the women and their level of education (Oka et al, 2016), number of family members, and cultivation area (Annisahaq et al, 2014), house yard potential, resource capacity, specific technology and institutions (Purwantini et al, 2012;Surtinah, 2018), environmental maintenance knowledge and attitude (Purwami et al, 2018;Kusnadi, 2019), and supervision from related parties (Kurniawan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…It reduced the budget used for vegetable purchases (Amran et al, 2016). Similar to this finding, vegetables and medicinal plants in the house yard had increased the level of household income in Bandung Regency (Hidayat, 2017), Batu City (Syam et al, 2018), Gianyar Regency (Oka et al, 2016), Kediri City (Annisahaq et al, 2014), Mimika Regency (Patadungan, 2019), Semarang City (Kusumaningsih & Tyas, 2019), Sintang Regency (Rini et al, 2019), Southeast Sulawesi (Tando, 2018), and Yogyakarta (Werdhany & Gunawan, 2012). The effectiveness and profitable effect of the program depended on farmers' knowledge, availability of land, and the duration of cultivation (Sukanata et al, 2015), demographic characteristics of the women and their level of education (Oka et al, 2016), number of family members, and cultivation area (Annisahaq et al, 2014), house yard potential, resource capacity, specific technology and institutions (Purwantini et al, 2012;Surtinah, 2018), environmental maintenance knowledge and attitude (Purwami et al, 2018;Kusnadi, 2019), and supervision from related parties (Kurniawan et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the research on "Analysis of the Added Value of the Sustainable Food House Area Program (KRPL) on the Household Economy" by (Syam, Saputri, and Widyastuti 2018), it can be seen that the implementation of the KRPL program has economic value added, the added economic value of the program can be seen from the activity of selling harvested goods by group members.…”
Section: Theoritical Underpiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Suputra et al (2016) di KWT Tunas Sejahtera menunjukkan bahwa persentase kontribusi pendapatan kegiatan KRPL sebesar 0,3 % dengan dampak ekonomis yang dirasakan responden dalam kegiatan ini tergolong kategori sedang dengan skor 66,9 %. Penelitian lain tentang pemanfaatan pekarangan menunjukkan bahwa penerimaan anggota KWT berkisar antara Rp 150.000 per bulan/anggota (Wulandari, 2018) sampai dengan Rp 193.492/bulan (Syam et al, 2018).…”
Section: Pendahuluan 11 Latar Belakangunclassified