2005
DOI: 10.1016/s1130-6343(05)73630-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análisis coste-eficacia de tenofovir versus zidovudina en terapia combinada con efavirenz y lamivudina para el tratamiento de VIH en pacientes no pretratados

Abstract: The regimen including zidovudine is less costly in the short run when compared to the regimen including tenofovir. Both regimens become financially similar when extending the study horizon.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
0
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to the previous studies [8, 9, 14]. These findings reveal an increasing evidence on the superiority of TDF/FTC/EFV in terms of efficacy and tolerability as first line regimen for naïve HIV-1 infected adult patients and support the inclination toward the preference of TDF/FTC/EFV as initial ART regimen over ZDV/3TC/EFV, due to its cost effectiveness and lower pill burden, besides superior efficacy and better tolerability [1821]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This finding is similar to the previous studies [8, 9, 14]. These findings reveal an increasing evidence on the superiority of TDF/FTC/EFV in terms of efficacy and tolerability as first line regimen for naïve HIV-1 infected adult patients and support the inclination toward the preference of TDF/FTC/EFV as initial ART regimen over ZDV/3TC/EFV, due to its cost effectiveness and lower pill burden, besides superior efficacy and better tolerability [1821]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…En vista a los resultados tenofovir supone un antirretroviral de gran efectividad en el hospital con un perfil de seguridad óptimo, excepto el renal. Esto le sitúa como una buena opción en el TARGA que también ha demostrado una buena relación coste efectividad (19).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified