Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Dasar Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama Di Indonesia

Maulani, Diah Gustiniati

doi:10.25041/fiatjustisia.v7no1.362

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In that article, there is an offence "whosoever" that is intended as a legal subject where the perpetrators of criminal acts in the Criminal Code referred to as subjects are people or humans (Maulani, 2013). In this case, according to article 1556a, the perpetrator of the crime is the subject or person or person.…”

Section: Criminal Accountability Against Religious Blasphemy Perpetra...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Juridical Analysis of Blasphemists of Religion Based on Criminal Perspective

Irawanto,

Santiago

2023

JWS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indonesia is a heterogeneous and pluralist country, especially regarding religious diversity. Although different, all religions in Indonesia become one in the spirit of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. However, the issue of blasphemy is considered taboo and very sensitive because it concerns interfaith and intertribal or ethnic interests. Therefore, the state is present to anticipate this problem with pre-prepared laws and regulations. So the purpose of this study is to find out and analyze related punishments and criminal violations related to blasphemy based on applicable legal regulations and theories in Indonesia. The method used is to study laws and regulations that are the primary references, books and legal journals as secondary material, and websites and social media as tertiary material. Indonesia's diverse society and democratic values demand that the country maintain harmony among different cultures. The state has prepared Article 156a to protect religion and its adherents, like other articles in the law. In blasphemy cases, the state should mediate and resolve disputes, punish violators, and support victims. Extensive discussions and analyses using various sources have been conducted about blasphemy cases.

show abstract

Section: Criminal Accountability Against Religious Blasphemy Perpetra...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Juridical Analysis of Blasphemists of Religion Based on Criminal Perspective

Irawanto,

Santiago

2023

JWS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…25 Sanksi diartikan sebagai tanggungan, tindakan, hukuman untuk memaksa orang menepati perjanjian atau menaati ketentuan undang-undang. 26 Berdasarkan pengertian sanksi tersebut dapat ditemukan dua kata kunci yakni sanksi bertujuan untuk memberikan hukuman dan hukuman tersebut pula berdasarkan ketentuan undang-undang. Selanjutnya dalam undang-undang, istilah sanksi kadangkala di tempatkan untuk mengelompokkan bagian-bagian hukuman untuk menegakkan undang-undang itu sendiri yakni berupa sanksi administratif, sanksi perdata, dan sanksi pidana dalam satu bab atau bagian.…”

Section: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pembuat Dan Sanksi Pidanaunclassified

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pengguntingan Bendera Negara Republik Indonesia

Iwamony,

Pasalbessy,

Sopacua

2023

TATOHI J. Ilmu Huk.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The crime of insulting the Red and White flag in Karawang, West Java and Malasya, the flag with a hammer picture at Hassanudin University and the flag brushed with a Water Closet (WC) brush violates the provisions of Article 66 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2009 in conjunction with Article 24 Letter a Law Number 24 Year 2009Purposes of the Research: Analyzing and explaining whether the perpetrators of insulting the flag can be held criminally responsible and forms of criminal responsibility for the act of insulting the red and white flag.Methods of the Research: It is normative juridical, using a legal, conceptual and case approach with primary and secondary legal materials and will be analyzed qualitatively.Results of the Research: Criminal liability from the first to the third case fulfills the five elements of responsibility, namely, there are perpetrators of criminal acts; there is an action; There is a mistake; capable of being responsible and against the law. Furthermore, the fourth case cannot be held accountable because the subject who committed the crime has a mental disorder that is not in accordance with the elements of criminal responsibility in Article 44 of the Criminal Code. The form of criminal liability in the first to third cases is individual, meaning that individual criminal responsibility is the form embedded in the case.

show abstract

Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Dasar Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama Di Indonesia

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Juridical Analysis of Blasphemists of Religion Based on Criminal Perspective

Juridical Analysis of Blasphemists of Religion Based on Criminal Perspective

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Pengguntingan Bendera Negara Republik Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About