2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022tc007491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analog and Numerical Modeling of Rift‐Rift‐Rift Triple Junctions

Abstract: Triple junctions involve the movement of three tectonic plates, and therefore represent one of the most challenging settings to understand deformation processes (e.g., Kleinrock & Morgan, 1988;McKenzie & Morgan, 1969;Patriat & Courtillot, 1984). McKenzie and Morgan (1969) identified 16 possible cases of triple junctions, among which the only stable case for all velocity conditions is the extensional Ridge-Ridge-Ridge triple junction (RRR), in which the three plates move away from each other. For this reason, R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of two tectonic phases, an orthogonal direction of extension imposed on the southern rift branch, as well as a high velocity ratio (R=4) make this model the best fit for comparison with the Afar triple junction (Maestrelli et al, 2022).…”
Section: Model Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of two tectonic phases, an orthogonal direction of extension imposed on the southern rift branch, as well as a high velocity ratio (R=4) make this model the best fit for comparison with the Afar triple junction (Maestrelli et al, 2022).…”
Section: Model Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analog models must be correctly scaled in terms of geometry/length, rheology, kinematic and dynamic evolution in order to be a realistic replica of the natural process under investigation (Hubbert, 1937;Ramberg, 1981;Weijermars & Schmeling, 1986). Specifically, for this model, the scaling follows the strategy adopted in Maestrelli et a. (2022).…”
Section: Model Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside of the two magmatic segments, relatively higher strain rates occur in a ∼ NW‐SE oriented region between the DMH and ASAL segments and at the southern tip of the DMH segment. While the strain localization at the southern tip of the DMH could be related to the formation of the triple junction in central Afar (Maestrelli et al., 2022), the higher strain rate between the DMH and ASAL segments clearly indicates incipient linkage between them.…”
Section: Deformation Rate From Geodesymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; e.g., see review in Corti (2012)). Many analog studies have focused attention on the role of pre-existing fabrics on rift-related faults at different scales (e.g., Bonini et al, 2023;Chattopadhyay & Chakra, 2013;Corti, 2008;Corti et al, 2007;Maestrelli et al, 2020Maestrelli et al, , 2022McClay & White, 1995;Molnar et al, 2019Molnar et al, , 2020Morley, 1999a;Sokoutis et al, 2007;Sun et al, 2010;Tron & Brun, 1991;Wang et al, 2021;Withjack & Jamison, 1986;Zwaan et al, 2016Zwaan et al, , 2021aZwaan et al, , 2021b, with some examples focusing on the reactivation of inherited heterogeneities in the brittle crust (e.g., Bellahsen & Daniel, 2005;Bonini et al, 2016Bonini et al, , 2023Brun & Tron, 1993;Corti et al, 2007;Maestrelli et al, 2020;Zwaan et al, 2021b). These studies used 1g models (i.e., models under normal gravity) to reproduce either distributed extension or focused deformation above a velocity discontinuity (VD) of a purely brittle or brittle/ductile system, showing that the orientation of the inherited fabrics with respect to the extension direction has a significant influence on reactivation and the resulting rift-related fault pattern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%