Analogical processes in children’s understanding of spatial representations.

Abstract

We propose that map reading can be construed as a form of analogical mapping. We tested 2 predictions that follow from this claim: First, young children's patterns of performance in map reading tasks should parallel those found in analogical mapping tasks; and, second, children will benefit from instructions that help them see the relational correspondences between the map and the space. In 4 experiments, 3-year-olds completed a map reading task in which they were asked to find hidden objects in a miniature room, using a corresponding map. We manipulated the availability of guided alignment (showing children the analogical mapping between maps and spaces; Experiments 1, 2, and 3a), the format of guided alignment (gesture or relational language; Experiment 2), and the iconicity of maps (Experiments 3a and 3b). We found that (a) young children's difficulties in map reading follow from known patterns of analogical development-for example, focusing on object similarity over relational similarity; and (b) guided alignment based on analogical reasoning led to substantially better performance. Results also indicated that children's map reading performance was affected by the format of guided alignment, the iconicity of the maps, and the order of tasks. The results bear on the developmental mechanisms underlying young children's learning of spatial representations and also suggest ways to support this learning. (PsycINFO Database Record

Relational Scaffolding Enhances Children’s Understanding of Scientific Models

“…Explicit comparisons illuminated shared relational structure (Goldwater & Gentner, 2015). A trained researcher pointed at and between videos of observed and modeled events to clarify key correspondences (Richland et al, 2007; Yuan, Uttal, & Gentner, 2017). The scaffolding was comprehensive, underscoring the coherence of the scientific model and discouraging inaccurate, piecemeal explanations (Au & Romo, 1996; Chi et al, 2012).…”

“…The two dotted arrows in (a) and (b) indicate back-and-forth gesturing between the videos. The format for this diagram is based on the work of Yuan, Uttal, and Gentner (2017).…”

Examining Infant Relation Categorization Through Deep Neural Networks

“…Relations are critical to human reasoning capacities (Goodwin and Johnson-Laird, 2005), and our understanding of the visual world around is mediated by spatial relations, as they help distinguish individual objects and combine them in order to understand visual scenes (Piaget, 1954;Johnson, 2010). Additionally, both relational learning (Newcombe and Huttenlocher, 2007) and analogical reasoning (Yuan et al, 2017) appear crucial to the development of spatial cognition, which guides infants' budding understanding of the world around them. Despite the importance of relations, little computational work has examined how infants could learn to categorize spatial relations, and why some categories are acquired before others over the course of development.…”

The role of inhibitory control in the development of analogical reasoning: From general to specific

“…In the original manuscript, the relative number matching task was used as a rule-use task. However, the relative relationship matching task (i.e., number and size) mainly involved inhibitory control(Rattermann and Gentner, 1998;Yuan, Uttal, & Gentner, 2017), which does not seem to be an appropriate task for determining the role of rule use in analogical reasoning. Thus, in this revised manuscript, the relative number matching task focuses on inhibitory control rather than rule use.…”