Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) 2020
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analogous Process Structure Induction for Sub-event Sequence Prediction

Abstract: Computational and cognitive studies of event understanding suggest that identifying, comprehending, and predicting events depend on having structured representations of a sequence of events and on conceptualizing (abstracting) its components into (soft) event categories. Thus, knowledge about a known process such as "buying a car" can be used in the context of a new but analogous process such as "buying a house". Nevertheless, most event understanding work in NLP is still at the ground level and does not consi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the previous works [49,50], we do not distinguish activities (or processes), states, and events. Instead, we use dependency patterns to represent all the eventualities that can be activities, states, and events and also discourse relations [30] such as COMPARISON.Contrast and CONTINGENCY.Cause as the relation types between eventualities based on the following two design principles.…”
Section: Design Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the previous works [49,50], we do not distinguish activities (or processes), states, and events. Instead, we use dependency patterns to represent all the eventualities that can be activities, states, and events and also discourse relations [30] such as COMPARISON.Contrast and CONTINGENCY.Cause as the relation types between eventualities based on the following two design principles.…”
Section: Design Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on schema induction has focused solely on textual resources through statistical methods [1,3,4,11,36] and neural approaches [1,23,24,30,43,44,49,59]. While [57] employ multimodal resources to extract procedural knowledge, the output is an implicit vector representation, unlike our work's explicit and interpretable schema.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pattern-Based Approaches. Taxonomies from experts (e.g., WordNet (Miller, 1995)) have proved effective in various reasoning applications (Song et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2020). Meanwhile, Hearst patterns (Hearst, 1992) make large corpora a good resource of explicit is-a pairs, resulting in automatically built hypernymy knowledge bases (Wu et al, 2012;Seitner et al, 2016) of large scales.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%