1988
DOI: 10.1051/agro:19880109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyse monosomique de la résistance à Septoria nodorum Berk chez le blé tendre (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell (Vill) M.K.)

Abstract: RÉSUMÉLes 21 lignées monosomiques du cv « Courtot » ont été croisées par la lignée « L 22 », résistante à la septoriose, utilisée comme pollinisatrice. Les Compared to the disomic Fl the monosomic for 3A, 4A, 2B, 5B, 2D, 7D and lA, 3B, 6B, 5D, 6D had an incubation time (LPI) increased (more resistance) or reduced (more susceptibility), respectively. Similarly the monosomic F1, 3A, 4A, 5A, 6A, 1B, 2B, 5B, 7B, 2D and line "L 22" showed a disease intensity (P max) reduced (more resistance) in early July, while … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two QTLs for SNB glume resistance were identified in this study, both located on the long arm of chromosome 2D. Stagonospora nodorum blotch resistance has been previously identified on chromosome 2D in the wheat line L22 using monosomic analysis (Auriau et al, 1988) and more recently conferring SNB resistance on wheat leaves but not glume resistance in a Forno × Oberkulmer RI population (Aguilar et al, 2005). Given that QSnl.eth ‐ 2D is not effective in glumes (Aguilar et al, 2005), it is likely that different genes reside on 2DL and the resistance locus in Oberkulmer is different from that of P91193D1 and Coker 8427, since there was no similarity at the marker loci Xgwm526.1 and Xcfd50.2…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Two QTLs for SNB glume resistance were identified in this study, both located on the long arm of chromosome 2D. Stagonospora nodorum blotch resistance has been previously identified on chromosome 2D in the wheat line L22 using monosomic analysis (Auriau et al, 1988) and more recently conferring SNB resistance on wheat leaves but not glume resistance in a Forno × Oberkulmer RI population (Aguilar et al, 2005). Given that QSnl.eth ‐ 2D is not effective in glumes (Aguilar et al, 2005), it is likely that different genes reside on 2DL and the resistance locus in Oberkulmer is different from that of P91193D1 and Coker 8427, since there was no similarity at the marker loci Xgwm526.1 and Xcfd50.2…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%