2012
DOI: 10.1121/1.4734237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of sex and individual differences in vocalizations of Australasian gannets using a dynamic time warping algorithm

Abstract: The study of the evolution of sexual differences in behavioral and morphological displays requires analyses of the extent of sexual dimorphism across various sensory modalities. In the seabird family Sulidae, boobies show dramatic sexual dimorphism in their vocalizations, and gannet calls have also been suggested to be dimorphic to human observers. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of sexually dimorphic calls in the Australasian gannet (Morus serrator) through the first comprehensive description of its… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, sound parametric representations, for example Mel frequency cepstral coefficients, used for speech signal processing are useful in bioacoustics settings, in particular for bird vocalisation analyses (Krull et al . ; Ranjard et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, sound parametric representations, for example Mel frequency cepstral coefficients, used for speech signal processing are useful in bioacoustics settings, in particular for bird vocalisation analyses (Krull et al . ; Ranjard et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Krull et al . ), and is related to the better known dynamic time warping algorithm (Buck & Tyack ). However, LD itself remains somewhat unknown in the field of animal acoustic communication.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as cetaceans, DTW has been widely used for analysing the vocalisations of birds [30], and other mammals [31]. This technique gives improved matching particularly when salient features in the whistle profile (such as peaks) may occur at slightly different times (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%