1998
DOI: 10.1080/00423119808969456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analyses of Vision-based Lateral Control for Automated Highway System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where the notations F i, j represent the x or y components of the lateral force vectors in Eqn. (11). The coefficients of the virtual pseudo-velocities in Eqn.…”
Section: Dynamic Vehicle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the notations F i, j represent the x or y components of the lateral force vectors in Eqn. (11). The coefficients of the virtual pseudo-velocities in Eqn.…”
Section: Dynamic Vehicle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding image processing algorithms are generally rather resource intensive, and most commercialized solutions are not capable of processing road information with high frequency [8,9]. As an example, the vision delay was considered to amount to 0.15 s in [10] and 0.2 s in [11]. In [12], a time constant of 0.3 s was used for a low level steering angle controller, while [3] used 0.4 s as a conservative estimate for the steering delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of driving action description several clear-cut situations have been studied exhaustively: lane following (Fenton, 1988;Mammar et al, 2006), car following at a safe distance (Gipps, 1981;Olstam et al, 2004), lane change (Gipps, 1986;Salvucci et al, 2007). For lane following on a curved road an extensive theory has been developed, mainly based on control engineering approaches (Hsu et al, 1998;Yuhara et al, 2001;Chen et al, 2006;Mammar et al, 2006). Yet speed control (so called longitudinal control), including speed on curves, has only been studied extensively from a car stability perspective (Jin et al, 2007;Hel et al, 2007;Song, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the updating rate can be boosted, information from camera can be adopted for electric vehicle motion control that needs fast sensor feedback. In addition, the performances of lane keeping and collision avoidance systems can be enhanced for traditional vehicles [4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, estimation methods for vehicle body slip angle have been extensively studied during the last few decades, and most of them are based on bicycle model [2][3]; however, such model suffers from model uncertainty problems because it includes uncertain parameters, for example, tire cornering stiffness. Other kinds of prevailing sensors such as camera, although demonstrated high accuracy on position estimation for lane keeping [4], are seldom utilized for EV motion control due to their low throughput characteristic and the image processing often takes time. On the other hand, in contradiction to vehicle bicycle model, visual model is purely based on simple geometry which contains much fewer uncertainties and the estimation results can hence be more robust against bicycle model uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%