2004
DOI: 10.1002/mde.1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing absence behaviour using event history models

Abstract: This paper analyses the absence behaviour of a group of industrial workers. Part of their remuneration scheme comprises an experience rated sick-pay scheme (linking level of sickpay to past absence) which determines the cost of a day's absence for a worker, both contemporaneously and in terms of expected future cost. This cost is explicitly computed for each worker and we show that this cost is negatively related to absence. Using an event history model with a Markov structure for the absence histories the siz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, motivational crowding theory and the theory on dissent-shirking make the mechanisms behind these associations more explicit. Furthermore, worker absence is influenced by the pressure to be at work formed by, for instance, market conditions such as the risk of unemployment (Hausknect et al 2008), the incentive system (Barmby and Sibly 2004), and work group norms (Spencer and Steers 1980;Drago and Wooden 1992;Hesselius et al 2009). The incentive systems for each occupational group are largely the same across the country, but the risk of unemployment and workgroup norms may vary geographically, and hence, we control for regional variations.…”
Section: Expectations: Relationships Between Perception Of Documentatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, motivational crowding theory and the theory on dissent-shirking make the mechanisms behind these associations more explicit. Furthermore, worker absence is influenced by the pressure to be at work formed by, for instance, market conditions such as the risk of unemployment (Hausknect et al 2008), the incentive system (Barmby and Sibly 2004), and work group norms (Spencer and Steers 1980;Drago and Wooden 1992;Hesselius et al 2009). The incentive systems for each occupational group are largely the same across the country, but the risk of unemployment and workgroup norms may vary geographically, and hence, we control for regional variations.…”
Section: Expectations: Relationships Between Perception Of Documentatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Barmby, Brown, and Treble (1997), Barmby, Orme, and Treble (1991; 1995), Barmby and Sibly (2004), Delgado and Kniesner (1997), and Gilleskie (1998). An earlier literature used more aggregated data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%