Analysing Humanly Generated Random Number Sequences: A Pattern-Based Approach

Abstract

In a random number generation task, participants are asked to generate a random sequence of numbers, most typically the digits 1 to 9. Such number sequences are not mathematically random, and both extent and type of bias allow one to characterize the brain's “internal random number generator”. We assume that certain patterns and their variations will frequently occur in humanly generated random number sequences. Thus, we introduce a pattern-based analysis of random number sequences. Twenty healthy subjects randomly generated two sequences of 300 numbers each. Sequences were analysed to identify the patterns of numbers predominantly used by the subjects and to calculate the frequency of a specific pattern and its variations within the number sequence. This pattern analysis is based on the Damerau-Levenshtein distance, which counts the number of edit operations that are needed to convert one string into another. We built a model that predicts not only the next item in a humanly generated random number sequence based on the item′s immediate history, but also the deployment of patterns in another sequence generated by the same subject. When a history of seven items was computed, the mean correct prediction rate rose up to 27% (with an individual maximum of 46%, chance performance of 11%). Furthermore, we assumed that when predicting one subject′s sequence, predictions based on statistical information from the same subject should yield a higher success rate than predictions based on statistical information from a different subject. When provided with two sequences from the same subject and one from a different subject, an algorithm identifies the foreign sequence in up to 88% of the cases. In conclusion, the pattern-based analysis using the Levenshtein-Damarau distance is both able to predict humanly generated random number sequences and to identify person-specific information within a humanly generated random number sequence.

Galvanic vestibular stimulation increases novelty in free selection of manual actions

“…This is also consistent with an account based on generation of novel behavior. Sequence length influences randomness for simple reasons of sampling, since the probability of generating novel choices inevitably increases with the length of the sequence (Schulz et al, 2012). Nevertheless, sequence length also affects randomness judgements, but in the opposite direction.…”

Sequential information in a great ape utterance

“…A third hypothesis is that, similar to human language, complexity enhances communicative potential of calls by callers combining basic acoustic elements to generate more complex structures262728293031 or by combining stand-alone calls into sequences32. For instance, in chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ), victim screams and ‘waa’ barks are stand-alone calls but they can also be produced in sequence during agonistic interactions, in which case they are directed at different audiences and have different functions33.…”

Cognitive Processing dissociation by mental effort manipulation in long demanding tasks

“…Random number generation task -In this task, the participant was instructed to generate numbers between 1 and 9 randomly, avoiding the generation of predefined sequences (such as 3, 4, 5 or 9, 8, 7) (Schulz et al 2012). This task requires the maintenance of several instructions and an understanding of the concept of randomness; integration of this information and its concomitant maintenance in working memory; adoption of strategies involving the selection of appropriate responses and inhibition of inappropriate responses; the monitoring of responses; and modification or alternation of the strategies employed, to maintain the randomness required by the task (Hamdan et al 2004;Jahanshahi et al 2006).…”