In text analysis studies coders have to make qualitative decisions. These decisions are based on interpretations of the texts under study. In such situations it is very helpful to have coding rules. These do not only help as an aid to the coder, but are also useful for readers of the research report that will follow. The rules make visible in considerable extent how the coding task has been performed, they take care of transparency. This contribution focuses on motions that have been treated in the Dutch House of Representatives. Motions usually contain information on why they are needed, the proposing member usually also tells about it. There is a discussion with the secretary, who is supposed to put the motion into effect if it is accepted. The secretary even has to give an advice. It is assumed that under these discussion(s) a cognitive map containing some game theoretic representation can be found. Rules are discussed that are used to code the types of maps that might be found.
IntroductionMany types of text are available that are not exploited yet. Looking at political debates we have among others party manifestos, speeches, debates. Party manifestos allow investigating parties with respect to their place on a left-right continuum (Laver & Garry, 2000) or on a scale denoting a relevant characteristic. This in its turn allows discovering how a party changes position over time. Slapin and Proksch (2008) demonstrate changes in economic, societal and foreign policy for several political parties in Germany. Speeches might be speeches by party officials, but also speeches by members of the parliament or members of the government. McLean and Patterson (2007) analyzed speeches on Iraq by the British Prime minister, who was at that time also party leader. Debates might be debates at a party meeting, but also a debate in democratic government's legislature like a parliament between members of different parties or between such members and the government. Bara, Weale and Bicquelet (2007), who actually compare the results found by using two different computer programs, consider the parliamentary debate. They look for dominant themes in the debates and try to find out how far speakers who take different positions follow a distinct pattern of discourse. Very often, certainly in governmental bodies, transcripts of such speeches or debates are available. Harris (1996) summarizes studies in which content analysis was used to understand negotiations. She showed that in these studies there has been a lot of attention for positive and negative behaviors and that also style and affect received attention. A disadvantage of discussions in general however is that it is unclear when a party will come with a reaction on an issue or statement; it is even possible that there will be no reaction at all.In debates in parliament sometimes typical formats are used for discussing issues. In many countries parliamentarians have the right to ask questions, to propose amendments to laws that are under construction or to propose motions. A m...