2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysing the behavioural, psychological, and demographic determinants of financial decision making of household investors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fit indices of the four-factor model were compared with those of other models, and the significant difference was used as the criterion to evaluate the discriminant validity of the model (Δχ 2 ; >3.84, >6.64, or >10.83) [ 14 ]. We applied the AVE and CR to evaluate convergent validity, where the values of AVE above 0.50 and CR above 0.70 indicated good convergent validity [ 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fit indices of the four-factor model were compared with those of other models, and the significant difference was used as the criterion to evaluate the discriminant validity of the model (Δχ 2 ; >3.84, >6.64, or >10.83) [ 14 ]. We applied the AVE and CR to evaluate convergent validity, where the values of AVE above 0.50 and CR above 0.70 indicated good convergent validity [ 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today's investment climate is blending financial and digital literacy. Additionally, P. Kumar, Islam, Pillai, and Sharif (2023) study digital literacy and financial information processing. They observed that technologically literate people can understand complex financial data and insights.…”
Section: Digital Literacy As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Path coefficients(β) ≥ 0 indicate a direct and positive relationship whereas β ≤ 0 indicates a direct and adverse relationship, zero indicates that there is no direct relationship between the variables (Attia et al, 2023). Moreover, β-value between 0.1-0.3 show weak impact, between 0.3-0.5 moderate impact and 0.5-1.0 strong influence (Kumar et al, 2023), while the p-value for 95% confidence level should be < 0.05. The results of hypotheses testing in tables 6 and 7 provide a useful insight into the decision-making process for high-rise fast-track projects.…”
Section: Structural Model (Path Analysis)mentioning
confidence: 99%