Analysing tourism stakeholders networks

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to analyze the variety of relations existing in tourism networks, identified as complex and mutable entities, where a vast range of stakeholders coexist.Design/methodology/approach -After a deep review on stakeholder theory, the research applies techniques of network analysis to a case study. Specifically, the analysis focuses on 354 hospitality firms acting in Molise Region (Italy). Each operator was asked to judge the importance to collaborate with other stakeholders to enhance the effectiveness of their management and marketing activities. The answers highlight the degree of preference among stakeholders and the resulting information is the level of confidence in the network.Findings -Results confirm the importance of intensifying relationships between tourism companies themselves and between them and policy makers. It appears that public stakeholders are more important for both management and marketing activities than private sector, since they place a much higher position in the scale of preference.Research limitations/implications -The paper provides a starting-point for further research about non-quantitative destination performance measurement, such as trust and commitment between the stakeholders in tourism destination, and the use of network analysis' techniques.Practical implications -Destination managers and policy-makers may use techniques of network analysis to elaborate useful information for planning and managing the relationships inside the tourism network.Originality/value -The paper offers a novel approach for developing network analysis in tourism network literature. It explores non-quantitative destination performance measurements and uses management and marketing activities to analyze relationships between public and private stakeholders.

The potential for craft brewing tourism development in the United States: a stakeholder view

“…Given the constraints of the study in terms of human, time, and financial resources, the study only focuses on this group. However, studying only one group of stakeholders is also in line with earlier tourism research (Dodds et al, 2010;Marshall et al, 2010;Presenza & Cipollina, 2010).…”

Resilience to climate change in a cross-scale tourism governance context: a combined quantitative-qualitative network analysis

“…At the same time, they continue to maintain strong individual municipalities, leading to economic benefits but also to changes in local identity and culture (e.g., Oviero-Garcia et al 2008, Pechlaner et al 2012. Destination governance is dependent on the network of actors delivering a number of products and services (Ruhanen et al 2010, Presenza and Cipollina, 2010, Haugland et al 2011, while destination success, as well as that of individual actors, is dependent, among other aspects, on governing complex networks (Beritelli et al 2007). Tourists experience their stay as one package, though such experiences comprise a multitude of services delivered by stakeholders along the tourism supply chain (Murphy et al 2000, Michel 2001).…”

Innovations and networking fostering tourist destination development in Slovakia

“…network analysis in tourism is a relatively new way of analysing the interactions between stakeholders, further explored in the works of Scott, Baggio and Cooper (2008), Baggio et al (2010), Presenza and Cipollina (2010), Beritelli, Strobl and Peters (2013), Del Chiappa and Presenza (2013), Grama andBaggio (2013), O´Sullivan (2014). Apart from the most used graphical interpretation, social network analysis can describe the relationships by quantitative characteristics (Table 3).…”