2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10470-014-0484-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and design of an electrostatic MEMS microphone using the PolyMUMPs process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Torkkeli et al [56] reported that, as the volume of the back chamber increased from 0.8 to 100 mm 3 , the sensitivity of microphone went up to 4 mV/Pa. The same effect has recently been observed by Grixti et al [111].…”
Section: Volume Of Back Chambersupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Torkkeli et al [56] reported that, as the volume of the back chamber increased from 0.8 to 100 mm 3 , the sensitivity of microphone went up to 4 mV/Pa. The same effect has recently been observed by Grixti et al [111].…”
Section: Volume Of Back Chambersupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, Table 8 shows a comparison with previous MEMS microphones. Our microphone has a sensitivity and bandwidth superior to the microphones reported in the literature [ 1 , 5 , 10 ] but has a lower SNR. The proposed design has a performance comparable with the commercial models; it was not possible to compare the internal dimensions due to the lack of information provided by the manufacturers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…[ 9 ] designed a MEMS capacitive microphone formed by a perforated aluminum diaphragm (500 µm × 500 µm × 3 µm). This microphone has a bandwidth up to 20 kHz and a sensitivity of 0.2 mV/Pa with a bias voltage of 105 V. Grixti et al [ 10 ] created a mathematical model of MEMS microphone composed by a clamped square diaphragm (675 µm × 675 µm), which is based on the PolyMUMPs process. This microphone is supplied by a voltage of 6 V, achieving a sensitivity of 8.4 mV/Pa and a cut-off frequency of 10.5 kHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the spring-capacitor system represents a good approximation for electrostatic transducers, a large-signal network model need not be based on this model, provided that an appropriate expression relating capacitance and deflection is found. Standard MEMS microphones [12], as well as CMUTs [13], are based on a membrane that bends upon application of an electric field, so the equation of a parallel-plate capacitor imposes certain limitations. A more recent development, the pull-in-free microphone from Ozdogan et al [25], is based electrostatic levitation and holds no resemblance to the springcapacitor system.…”
Section: B Generalisation Of the Capacitance And Electrostatic Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic MEMS microphones have already found widespread use [26]. Grixti et al [12] show the design of a diaphragmbased electrostatic MEMS microphone whose sensitivity has negligible temperature dependency (unlike traditional electret condenser microphones). Applications of this principle also extend to the ultrasound range, where capacitive micromachined transducers (CMUTs) have emerged as an interesting alternative to piezoelectric transducers [13], [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%