2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2014.6954210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and development of an axial flux magnetic gear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these works [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] are consistent when it comes to the limitations caused by axial forces. They point to the need to reduce axial forces and to ensure appropriate gear rigidity as early as at the design phase, also taking the bearing arrangement into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All of these works [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] are consistent when it comes to the limitations caused by axial forces. They point to the need to reduce axial forces and to ensure appropriate gear rigidity as early as at the design phase, also taking the bearing arrangement into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The appearance of a study [3] on a group of AFMGs was only a matter of time. This subject has been continued in papers [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], wherein a number of analyses concerning the principles of operation and the design aspects of these gears, largely supported by measurements, were presented. Given the nature of the phenomena in the mentioned group of MGs, the majority of the papers employ 3D numerical models; however, the authors of Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mezani et al [13] first demonstrated the performance of a 5.75:1 axial flux MG and calculated that a 70 N·m/L torque density could be achieved when using a 200 mm outer diameter. Subsequently, Johnson et al [14] and Hirata et al [15] experimentally studied surface‐mounted axial MGs, however, both designs did not achieve torque densities greater than equivalent direct‐drive generators. For instance, the axial surface‐mounted MG design tested by Johnson et al had a 6.67:1 gear ratio with a 5 mm air‐gap, the resulted torque density was only 22 N·m/L.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the mechanical gears can achieve a high torque density but always suffer from some inherent problems, which actually causes a higher use-cost. In contrast, the magnetic gear (MG) offers significant advantages of reduced noise, minimum vibration, free from maintenance, improved reliability, and inherent overload protection [1], thus being promising alternative to the mechanical gears in the applications of electric vehicles [2], wind power generation [3], and low-speed high-torque reciprocating applications [4]. In [5], the development status of MGs, including the converted and field-modulated topologies, has been reviewed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%