2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2018.5931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing and experimentally testing a flux‐focusing axial flux magnetic gear for an ocean generator application

Abstract: The torque density characteristics for an axial flux magnetic gear using a flux-focusing topology is experimentally studied when using neodymium iron boron (NdFeB) rare-earth magnets. A geometric parameter sweep analysis was utilised in order to maximise both the calculated volumetric and mass torque density. The calculated torque and torque density was 628.6 N•m and 173.02 N•m/L while the experimentally measured torque and resultant torque density was 553.2 N•m and 152.3 N•m/L. Fig. 2 Axial flux density, B z … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the radial-flux structure, the FMMG can be built in the axial-flux frames [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] as shown in Figure 11. The axial-flux FMMG is preferred particularly in applications requiring flat outside shapes and hermetic isolation between the input and output shafts [75].…”
Section: Direction Of Magnetic Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the radial-flux structure, the FMMG can be built in the axial-flux frames [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74] as shown in Figure 11. The axial-flux FMMG is preferred particularly in applications requiring flat outside shapes and hermetic isolation between the input and output shafts [75].…”
Section: Direction Of Magnetic Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former, e.g. 2D and 3D finite‐element method (FEM) as employed for radial and axial‐flux machines [1–4], although precise, are very time‐consuming and not suitable for the preliminary designs, while analytical approaches provide fast, flexible and relatively accurate calculations, introducing a powerful tool for the design procedure. The second technique may be divided into two categories: first, subdomain methods which are on the basis of Laplace's and Poisson's equations as used for surface‐mounted PM machines [5, 6], switched reluctance machine [7], and flux switching machine [8]; second, flux‐tube models or magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) approaches as used for salient pole [9], flux‐switching [10], Vernier [11], and switched reluctance [12] machines as well as magnetic bearings [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element method (FEM) is a powerful numerical technique in the analysis of electric machines SRMs to PM machines [1][2][3][4]; however, FEM is expensive and time-consuming. On the other hand, analytical approaches are fast yet accurate alternative techniques that are very effective in preliminary designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%