2006
DOI: 10.1118/1.1999126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and minimization of overtraining effect in rule‐based classifiers for computer‐aided diagnosis

Abstract: Computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) schemes have been developed to assist radiologists detect various lesions in medical images. In CAD schemes, classifiers play a key role in achieving a high lesion detection rate and a low false-positive rate. Although many popular classifiers such as linear discriminant analysis and artificial neural networks have been employed in CAD schemes for reduction of false positives, a rule-based classifier has probably been the simplest and most frequently used one since the early day… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Please note that the FROC curve for training is located above that for testing, which indicates that overtraining bias occurred in our CAD scheme for nodule detection. However, the extent of overtraining bias in the automated rule-based classifier appears limited because the overtraining bias in the step of cutoff threshold selection was completely eliminated for the automated rule-based classifier [24]. Figure 7 shows the mean FROC curves obtained by testing our CAD scheme for the nodules in the American dataset and the Japanese dataset, and for all nodules.…”
Section: Results Of Initial Nodule Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Please note that the FROC curve for training is located above that for testing, which indicates that overtraining bias occurred in our CAD scheme for nodule detection. However, the extent of overtraining bias in the automated rule-based classifier appears limited because the overtraining bias in the step of cutoff threshold selection was completely eliminated for the automated rule-based classifier [24]. Figure 7 shows the mean FROC curves obtained by testing our CAD scheme for the nodules in the American dataset and the Japanese dataset, and for all nodules.…”
Section: Results Of Initial Nodule Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing rule-based classifiers are generally designed manually, and therefore, they often lead to a large overtraining effect, i.e., a large difference between the estimated performance levels of training and testing [24].…”
Section: False Positive Reduction By Use Of An Automated Rule-based Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations