2012
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2011.2182054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and Mitigation of Parasitic Mode Conversion for Microstrip to Stripline Transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially troublesome in circuits with large metallization layers on both the front side and the back side, as in circuits that use conductor-backed coplanar waveguides (CPW) or stripline interconnects [1], [4]. Traditionally, most circuits operating above 100 GHz have used conductor-backed CPW interconnects [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially troublesome in circuits with large metallization layers on both the front side and the back side, as in circuits that use conductor-backed coplanar waveguides (CPW) or stripline interconnects [1], [4]. Traditionally, most circuits operating above 100 GHz have used conductor-backed CPW interconnects [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the AIP, stripline feed network is adopted, although it needs more substrate volume than microstrip structure. Also, parallel plate modes [12] appeared at the operating frequencies, due to stripline structure. Shorting vias are placed around the slot aperture to effectively suppress them.…”
Section: B Aperture Coupled Antenna Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground via1, via2 and via3 are also used for the impedance matching at high frequency, and the relative position to the signal strip should be optimized according to the taper size. Ground via2 at proper position near the trace can inhibit the excitation of parallel-plates mode which is characterized as a semi-cylindrical wave [12]. And the crosssectional E-field of the transition is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Transition Configuration and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%