4th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 1995) 1995
DOI: 10.21437/eurospeech.1995-243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis and modeling of fundamental frequency contours of English utterances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this point of view, analysis has been made of F0 contours of a number of utterances of each of the following languages: English [13], Estonian [14], German [15], Greek [16], Korean [17], Polish, and Spanish [18]. The six panels (a)∼(f) in Fig.…”
Section: Languages With Only Positive Local Commandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, analysis has been made of F0 contours of a number of utterances of each of the following languages: English [13], Estonian [14], German [15], Greek [16], Korean [17], Polish, and Spanish [18]. The six panels (a)∼(f) in Fig.…”
Section: Languages With Only Positive Local Commandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the weight relative to the length of the previous word, W lpw , the length of the word is considered plus the length of the eventual pause. This factor assumes a higher correlation with presence of CF, for values above 0.5 s. The weight used for this factor is given by equation (2).…”
Section: Cfs Not Linked With Orthographic Marksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F0 is the most perceptually relevant component in prosody. The Fujisaki model of F0 was been proven to be well adapted with very high naturalness to several languages [1] like Japanese, Korean, Spanish, Polish, Greek, Swedish, English [2], German [3], Basque [4] and now also Portuguese. The Fujisaki model [1] consists of the logarithmic addition of baseline fundamental frequency, phrase components and accent components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many functions were tested (linear, power, transfer, decay, exponential) for the best approximation of the natural F 0 contour. In the system presented, an exponential function for the phrase component P c (t) [14,16,17] was adopted and a cosinusoidal function for accents and final boundary contours A c (t). The F 0 contour is thus defined by the following equation:…”
Section: The Synthesis Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach maximally reduces the amount of input prosodic information by applying a set of rules directly to the text. The so-called quantitative model of analysis and interpretation of the F 0 contour was proposed by many authors [12,13,14], with a differing number and complexity of the functions which try to simulate natural F 0 contours. In this paper, a global approach to modeling the F 0 contour is defined, mainly based on the so-called superpositional approach [14], which regards an F 0 contour as consisting of two different types of components:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%