Executive SummarySmart ventilation systems use controls to ventilate more during those periods that provide either an energy or IAQ advantage (or both) and less during periods that provide a disadvantage. Using detailed building simulations, this study addresses one of the simplest and lowest cost types of smart controllers-outdoor temperature-based control. If the outdoor temperature falls below a certain cut-off, the fan is simply turned off. The main principle of smart ventilation used in this study is to shift ventilation from time periods with large indoor-outdoor temperature differences, to periods where these differences are smaller, and their energy impacts are expected to be less. Energy and IAQ performance are assessed relative to a base case of a continuously operated ventilation fan sized to comply with ASHRAE 62.2-2013 whole house ventilation requirements. In order to satisfy 62.2-2013, annual pollutant exposure must be equivalent between the temperature controlled and continuous fan cases. This requires ventilation to be greater than 62.2 requirements when the ventilation system operates. This is achieved by increasing the mechanical ventilation system airflow rates.There were four steps to this analysis:1. The outdoor temperature cut-offs were calculated-either as a fixed temperature (5°C), a fixed percentile (Q25 th ) 1 2. The REGCAP simulation tool was used to estimate the energy savings and IAQ impacts of using these cut-offs to control a mechanical exhaust fan. The simulated fans were not oversized and not compliant with 62.2-2013., or based on infiltration estimates (Inf and Inf2) using the stack part of the enhanced ventilation model (AIM-2) in the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals.3. Exhaust fans were resized to maintain equivalence with 62.2-2013 using an iterative optimization procedure that incorporated both the stack and wind parts of the AIM-2 ventilation model. 4. The REGCAP simulation tool was used to calculate energy use and relative exposures, using oversized fans that provided equivalence with 62.2-2013.As shown in the figure below, new and existing, single-and two-story test homes from 10 to 3 ACH50 had substantial energy savings from the control of ventilation systems based on outdoor temperature, while maintaining equivalence with ASHRAE 62.2-2013 through fan oversizing. These savings reflect the maximum energy reduction estimate of the four temperature cut-off types (5°C, Q25 th , Inf and Inf2), for each combination of climate zone, airtightness, stories and house age. Limited savings were realized in milder climates for tighter homes of 1.5 ACH50. Temperature control is not recommended in climate zone 1 or in 0.6 ACH50 cases. In most cases, savings were greatest in 3 and 5 ACH50 homes. Annual HVAC energy 1 25 th percentile of annual hourly temperatures from TMY3 data files.iii savings ranged from approximately 100 kWh to 4,000 kWh (0.1 to 6% of total HVAC energy use). Absolute energy reductions generally increased with climate severity, though percentage savings were more consi...