2019
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Airport Network in Pakistan Utilizing Complex Network Approach

Abstract: Field of complex network covers different social, technological, biological, scientific collaborative work, communication networks and many others. Among these networks, transportation network is an important indicator to measure the economic growth in any country. In this study different dynamics of Airport Network in Pakistan are analyzed by the complex network methodology. Dataset of air transportation has been collected from Civil Aviation Authority of Pakistan (CAA) and formatted to accomplish the complex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weighted Newman approach is utilized to calculate closeness centrality, which is displayed in Figure 10 [15,22,23]. Eq.…”
Section: Centralization Approaches Considered For the Dengue Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighted Newman approach is utilized to calculate closeness centrality, which is displayed in Figure 10 [15,22,23]. Eq.…”
Section: Centralization Approaches Considered For the Dengue Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results on the Chinese airport network (199 nodes) and the US airport network (332 nodes and 2126 links) were reported. [39] Critical nodes in the Pakistan airport network (44 airports) were identified, mainly based on degree, closeness, and betweenness.…”
Section: Clemente Et Al 2019 [37]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout published literature, the estimation of shortest path was based on of the following factors: 1) the number of links needed in order to travel between two airports (e.g., Paleari et al, 2010;Dai et al, 2018;Ren et al, 2019); 2) the travel distance (e.g., Sun et al, 2017;Wandelt et al, 2019); 3) the travel time (e.g., Zhu et al, 2018); or 4) the travel velocity (e.g., Zhu et al, 2018). Whereas link weight estimation was based on flight frequency (e.g., Hossain and Alam, 2017;Malik et al, 2019) and flight capacity (e.g., Muriel-Villegas et al, 2016;Zhu et al, 2018;Hossain and Alam, 2017). However, none of the previous studies considered the combinations of all such factors in influencing the ATIN robustness.…”
Section: Scope and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%