2016
DOI: 10.1090/mcom/3124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of an augmented mixed-FEM for the Navier-Stokes problem

Abstract: In this paper we propose and analyze a new augmented mixed finite element method for the Navier-Stokes problem. Our approach is based on the introduction of a "nonlinearpseudostress" tensor linking the pseudostress tensor with the convective term, which leads to a mixed formulation with the nonlinear-pseudostress tensor and the velocity as the main unknowns of the system. Further variables of interest, such as the fluid pressure, the fluid vorticity and the fluid velocity gradient, can be easily approximated a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next, proceeding similarly as in (see also ), that is defining now the tensor σ : = μ ( | e ( u ) | ) e ( u ) ( u u ) p I in Ω using the incompressibility and the foregoing equation to eliminate the pressure, introducing the auxiliary unknowns t : = e ( u ) and ρ : = u e ( u ) , which denote the strain and the vorticity, respectively, and observing from (2.5) that bold-italicσ is now required to be symmetric, which improves the approach from , we arrive at the following system of equations with unknowns t , u , σ , and bold-italicρ u = t + ρ in Ω , μ ( | t | ) t ( u u ) d = bold-italicσ d in Ω , d i v σ = bold-italicf in Ω , <...>…”
Section: The Model Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, proceeding similarly as in (see also ), that is defining now the tensor σ : = μ ( | e ( u ) | ) e ( u ) ( u u ) p I in Ω using the incompressibility and the foregoing equation to eliminate the pressure, introducing the auxiliary unknowns t : = e ( u ) and ρ : = u e ( u ) , which denote the strain and the vorticity, respectively, and observing from (2.5) that bold-italicσ is now required to be symmetric, which improves the approach from , we arrive at the following system of equations with unknowns t , u , σ , and bold-italicρ u = t + ρ in Ω , μ ( | t | ) t ( u u ) d = bold-italicσ d in Ω , d i v σ = bold-italicf in Ω , <...>…”
Section: The Model Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark in advance that, differently from , Lemma 4.3, Theorem 4.4], where a Strang‐type lemma was used for its proof, we now follow a more straightforward approach, which is based on a suitable decomposition of the error and the Galerkin orthogonality condition. This alternative argumentation can be utilized for the error analysis of other nonlinear problems as well (see, e.g., ).…”
Section: The Galerkin Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that they both satisfy (2.3) with (μ 1 , μ 2 ) = (2, 3) and (μ 1 , μ 2 ) = (α 0 , α 0 + α 1 ), respectively. Next, following [13] and [16], we observe that the first equation in (2.1) can be rewritten as the equilibrium equation…”
Section: The Navier-stokes Equations With Variable Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, the approach in [11] employs a technique previously applied to the Navier-Stokes equations with constant viscosity (see [12] and [32]), which is based on the introduction of a modified pseudostress tensor involving the diffusive and convective terms, and the pressure. The latter is then eliminated thanks to the incompressibility condition, and the nonlinear viscosity is handled by incorporating the gradient of velocity as an auxiliary tensor unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%