2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of artificially degraded DNA using STRs and SNPs—results of a collaborative European (EDNAP) exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As with all polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, allele dropouts may pose a problem owing to low-quality DNA, and this might in turn falsely be interpreted as LOH. The problem of allele dropouts is, however, more pronounced when using microsatellite markers (Utsuno and Minaguchi, 2004;Petkovski et al, 2005;Dixon et al, 2006). Consequently, the use of SNP markers as well as careful DNA quantification and genotyping multiple parallel samples should ensure reliable estimates of LOH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with all polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, allele dropouts may pose a problem owing to low-quality DNA, and this might in turn falsely be interpreted as LOH. The problem of allele dropouts is, however, more pronounced when using microsatellite markers (Utsuno and Minaguchi, 2004;Petkovski et al, 2005;Dixon et al, 2006). Consequently, the use of SNP markers as well as careful DNA quantification and genotyping multiple parallel samples should ensure reliable estimates of LOH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, a collaborative study between nine European and US laboratories was organised under the auspices of the European DNA Profiling group (EDNAP) on the same sets of degraded samples. The results were collated and analysed and, in general, mini-STR systems were shown to be the most effective [26]. Since then, a number of other studies have demonstrated that successful analysis of degraded DNA specimens from mass disasters or compromised forensic evidence improves with smaller-sized PCR products [8,10,12,14,[27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: History and Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in the literature, the amplicon size of a miniSTR is below 200bp, above which chances of getting a complete profile from a degraded sample diminish significantly [42]. Others have suggested that the optimum product size is below 150bp [26]. Only a handful of studies are available on ChrX miniSTRs which are often combined with other larger-amplicon size markers, hence making them unsuitable for use in degraded sample studies and casework.…”
Section: X-chromosomal Strs and Ministrs: Identity Testing And Beyondmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, storage conditions are also important for DNA yield and quality, such as temperature and storage and transfer time. To avoid high temperature and long transfer times, the samples were refrigerated and frozen more carefully during transport and storage, which can prevent DNA degradation and bacteria growth (Dixon et al, 2006, Rogers et al, 2007. As reported, highquality DNA was obtained after transport at room temperature for 1 week and storage for 13-14 months at -70 ºC (London et al, 2001).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%