2008
DOI: 10.1375/twin.11.5.546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Application of Salivary DNA in Twin Research of Chinese Children

Abstract: S ince saliva collection is noninvasive, painless and inexpensive, it may become an alternative to obtain genomic DNA, which is critical to evaluate zygosity and the role of genetic factors in twin research. This study provided a rough description of salivary DNA in Chinese twin children, and presented the DNA yield and quality extracted from saliva in a large-scale children sample, which supplied an example for saliva sample using in genetic epidemiology. Three milliliters of saliva was collected from 356 twi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method of determination has an accuracy rate of 99.0% (Rogers, Cole, Lan, Crossa, & Demerath, 2007). Reliability and validity have been supported in a Chinese sample (Chen et al, 2010;Zhang & Ji, 2008).…”
Section: Zygosity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This method of determination has an accuracy rate of 99.0% (Rogers, Cole, Lan, Crossa, & Demerath, 2007). Reliability and validity have been supported in a Chinese sample (Chen et al, 2010;Zhang & Ji, 2008).…”
Section: Zygosity Determinationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Koni et al [1] recently made clear the limitations of low-quality DNA in biobanks, in addition to summarizing previous studies that used saliva collection to obtain DNA. The concentration of DNA extracted from blood leukocytes processed by saline extraction is 28.4 μg (11.3-59.5 μg) from 2 mL of blood [5], whereas the quantity of DNA obtained by saliva collection is 34.91 μg (2.20 – 122.04 μg) from 3 mL of saliva [6]. Although saliva collection provides smaller amounts of DNA than blood, this biological sampling method has been widely used, especially because it requires more simple logistics, including self-collection by study subjects and sample mailing [7-11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%