2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-8127-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of bending mechanism and spring-back characteristics in the offset Z-bending process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reversed bending stress is the stress generated by the bending phenomena, where the generated compressive and tensile stresses are formed on the opposite side of those formed in the bending allowance zone. These stress distribution analyses generally agree with those reported in the literature [14]. For the aforementioned stress characteristics, the same level of generated bending stress on the bending allowance zone and the reversed bending stress on legs could be obtained as …”
Section: Effects Of U-geometry Parameters On the Spring-back Charactesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Reversed bending stress is the stress generated by the bending phenomena, where the generated compressive and tensile stresses are formed on the opposite side of those formed in the bending allowance zone. These stress distribution analyses generally agree with those reported in the literature [14]. For the aforementioned stress characteristics, the same level of generated bending stress on the bending allowance zone and the reversed bending stress on legs could be obtained as …”
Section: Effects Of U-geometry Parameters On the Spring-back Charactesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To define the accuracy of the friction coefficient, as per past research [4,8,19], the contact surface model, defined by Coulomb friction law, was applied. By comparing the FEM simulation results obtained from each friction coefficient (0.08, 0.10 and 0.12) with the experimental results, the contact interfaces between the sheet and the tool, defined with a friction coefficient value of 0.10, were in good agreement, which corresponded well with the literature [10,13,14,16]. The other process parameter conditions were designed as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Fem Simulation Modelsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations